Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: FLAMOS ENTERPRISES INC.

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related health inspection of FLAMOS ENTERPRISES INC. in 1835 DUEBER AVE, CANTON, OH 44706 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 333975639.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Flamos Enterprises INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Flamos Enterprises INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1835 DUEBER AVE
City
CANTON
State
OH
ZIP
44706
Mailing
1501 RAFF RD SW, CANTON, OH 44710
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238320
Employees
75
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.62 E02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2012
Abate by
Aug 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
29 CFR 1926.62(e)(2)(i):     The employer did not establish and implement a written compliance program to achieve compliance with 29 CFR 1926.62(c) prior to commencement of the job:    No written compliance program was developed for work done on the Timken site.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3500
  • · Z (S) $3500

1926.62 G02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2012
Abate by
Aug 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
29 CFR 1926.62(g)(2)(iv):     The employer did not assure that all protective clothing was removed at the completion of a work shift only in change areas provided for that purpose as prescribed in 29 CFR 1926.62(i)(2):    Employees using compressed air and cob blasting at the Timken site, to clean a crane,  removed Tyvek clothing and shoes in the work area.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3500
  • · Z (S) $3500

1926.62 I02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2012
Abate by
Aug 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.62(i)(2)(i):     The employer did not provide clean change areas as an interim protection for employees performing tasks as specified in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2), without regard to the use of respirators:    Employees using compressed air to clean the crane and using cob blasting at the Timken site were not provided with clean change rooms.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.62 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2012
Abate by
Aug 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $38,500 · Current $7,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(iii):     The employer did not collect personal samples representative of a full shift, including at least one sample for each job classification in each work area, either for each shift or for the shift with the highest exposure level:    No air sampling was done when the crane was cleaned using air pressure and when cob blasting was done.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $7000
  • · Z (W) $38500

1926.62 H05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2012
Abate by
Aug 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.62(h)(5):     Compressed air was used to remove lead from a surface:    The crane located at the Timken site was cleaned with compressed air, which was not used with a ventilation system to capture the airborne dust.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (W) $0

1926.62 N01 II C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2012
Abate by
Aug 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.62(n)(1)(ii)(C):     Exposure monitoring records did not include the type of respiratory devices worn:    Air sampling records collected during lead paint removal work on 3/27/2012 and 4/2/2012 did not list this information.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1926.62 N01 II D

Other-than-serious 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2012
Abate by
Aug 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.62(n)(1)(ii)(D):     Exposure monitoring records did not include the name, social security number, and job classification of the employee monitored and of all other employees whose exposure the measurement was intended to represent:    a)  Air sampling record for a sample collected during lead paint removal work on 3/27/2012 did not list the social security number and job classification of the employee monitored.    b)  Air sampling record for a sample collected during lead paint removal work on 4/2/2012 did not list the name, social security number and job classification of the employee monitored.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1926.62 N01 II E

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2012
Abate by
Aug 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.62(n)(1)(ii)(E):     Exposure monitoring records did not include the environmental variables that could affect the measurements of employee exposure:    Air sampling records collected during lead paint removal work on 3/27/2012 and 4/2/2012 did not list this information.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 333975639.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.