BENSENVILLE, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: REBA MACHINE COMPANY
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of REBA MACHINE COMPANY in 828 EAGLE DRIVE, BENSENVILLE, IL 60106 (NAICS 333512). OSHA activity number 334017837.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- REBA MACHINE COMPANY
- Site address
- 828 EAGLE DRIVE
- City
- BENSENVILLE
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60106
- Mailing
- 828 EAGLE DRIVE, BENSENVILLE, IL 60106
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333512
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Mar 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 17, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. a. On or about February 28, 2013, the Agency (OSHA) had not received abatement documentation for Citation 1 Item 2 for Inspection number 401783 - Machine Guarding for the VM24 Millitronics. b. On or about February 28, 2013, the Agency (OSHA) had not received abatement documentation for Citation 1 Item 3 for Inspection number 401783 - Machine Guarding for the MM18 Millitronics. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $400
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l) The employer authorized production employees to operate the powered industrial trucks failing to provide training that included a practical training, (demonstration performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee) and an evaluation of the operators performance in the workplace. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $2000
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: The employer failed to provide methods of machine guarding that would protect employees while operating the following equipment: The side door on the VM24 Millitronics was missing, thereby exposing employees to rotating parts. The employer failed to properly guard this machine to prevent employees exposure to lacerations, cuts and amputations. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $1400
- · C (S) $2800
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): The employer failed to provide methods of machine guarding that would protect employees while operating the following equipment: The front side of the MM18 Millitronics was not properly guarded exposing employees to the point of operation. The employer failed to properly guard these machines to prevent exposure to lacerations, cuts and amputations. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $2800
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.213 B01
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.213(b)(1): Woodworking machine(s) were not provided with mechanical or electrical power controls so located that the operator could cut off the power from the machine without leaving his position at the point of operation: The power switch on The Metal Max Vertical/Horizontal band saw was damaged. The employer failed to ensure equipment was safe to operate without leaving the point of operation position by performing an examination of the equipment prior to permitting equipment operation. Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $1400
- · C (S) $2800
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.213 I01
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.213(i)(1): Non-working portion(s) of the blade of bandsaw(s) were not enclosed or guarded: The blade guard on the Metal Max Vertical/Horizontal band saw, serial number 04050075, was not being used or adjusted prior to operating equipment leaving the unused portion of the blade exposed. Employees were exposed to lacerations, fractures and/or amputations upon accidental contact. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $2800
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.303 B01
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1): Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: The insulation on The Metal Max Vertical/Horizontal band saw wire was damaged, exposing employees to electrical shocks. Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.303 B07 I
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7)(i): Unused openings in boxes, raceways, auxiliary gutters, cabinets, equipment cases, or housings were not effectively closed to afford protection substantially equivalent to the wall of the equipment The employer failed to cover unused openings on the electrical panel near the exit door adjacent to VM24 and VM17 machining centers. Employees were exposed to shocks, burns and electrocution while accessing the panel and accidentally inserting their fingers in the openings. Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (3)
- · F (O) $0
- · C (S) $2000
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition. Production Area. Dust and metal chips accumulations were around the machines and workstations. This includes areas that had not been used for 3 or 4 days. Normal production operations and cleaning operations may expose employees to sharp metal pieces and chips. Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (3)
- · F (O) $0
- · C (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333512)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334017837.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.