Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,288Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-24 Last loaded 2026-07-31

OSHA Inspection: STEEL SERVICE BLDG. CO.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of STEEL SERVICE BLDG. CO. in 24304 AMAH PARKWAY, CLAREMORE, OK 74017 (NAICS 332322). OSHA activity number 334024627.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Steel Service Bldg. CO. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Steel Service Bldg. CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
24304 AMAH PARKWAY
City
CLAREMORE
State
OK
ZIP
74017
Mailing
24304 AMAH PARKWAY, CLAREMORE, OK 74017
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332322
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

Citation 01001A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 22, 2012
Abate by
Jul 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $816 Reduced
5(a)(1):  Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the condition(s) listed below:    On or about April 24, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the load hook of an overhead crane was observed having a safety latch not working properly.  This exposed the employee to the dropped on and/or struck by hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $816
  • — Z (S) $1360

1910.179 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 22, 2012
Abate by
Aug 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(i):     Crane(s) equipped with a power traveling mechanism were not provided with a gong or other effective warning signal:      On or about April 24, 2012, and at times prior to, in the shop areas an overhead crane was operated by a remote control device to lift materials was not provided with the means (audible alarm or strobe light) to warn employees working in the areas when the cranes were on the move.  Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 22, 2012
Abate by
Aug 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,020 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:        On or about April 24, 2012, and at times prior thereto at the facility in three instances the employer allowed employees to operate various machines without a guard provided:    a: The roll sheet former machines were observed not having guard provided.       b: A conveyor belt was observed not having in-running nip points protected.    c: A ridge cap former was observed not having point-of-operation guards provided.    Employees were exposed to amputation caused by the unguarded point-of operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1020
  • — Z (S) $1700

1910.213 B03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 22, 2012
Abate by
Jul 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,020 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(b)(3): Provisions were not made to prevent woodworking machine(s) from automatically restarting upon restoration of power after power failure:      On or about April 24, 2012, and at times prior thereto, at the saw area employees were allowed to operate a radial arm saw to cut lumber; the saw did not have an "anti-restart device installed to prevent automatic restarting of the saw.  Employees were exposed to amputation and/or struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1020
  • — Z (S) $1700

1910.213 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 22, 2012
Abate by
Jul 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.213(h)(1): The sides of the lower exposed portion of the blade of radial saw(s) were not guarded to the full diameter of the blade by a device that automatically adjusted itself to the thickness of the stock and remained in contact with the stock being cut.      On or about April 24, 2012, and at times prior thereto, in the saw areas employees were allowed to operate a radial saw which did not have lower blade guards provided  the right side.  Employees were exposed to amputation hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.213 H04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 22, 2012
Abate by
Jul 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.213(h)(4): Radial saw(s) were not installed in a manner so as to cause the cutting head to return gently to the starting position when released by the operator:      On or about April 24, 2012, and at times prior thereto, in the saw areas employees were allowed to operate a radial arm saw which was not installed in a manner so as to cause the cutting head to return gently to the starting position when released by the operator.  Employees were exposed to amputation hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334024627.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.