Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: AGORA INTELLECTUAL, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AGORA INTELLECTUAL, INC. in 84 EAST AVENUE, AUSTIN, TX 78701 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 334033024.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Agora Intellectual, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Agora Intellectual, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
84 EAST AVENUE
City
AUSTIN
State
TX
ZIP
78701
Mailing
14506 GREAT EAGLE TRAIL, AUSTIN, TX 78734
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B02

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2012
Abate by
May 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2):   The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  On or about February 28, 2012, three employees were working on the construction site without the employer ensuring that the employees were trained on the potential hazards they could be exposed to, exposing the employees to hazards such as, but not limited to being struck by falling objects.   Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that each person working for the employer receives training on the potential hazards they are exposed to.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $1800

1926.100 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2012
Abate by
May 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a):   Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:  On or about February 28, 2012, three employees were working on the job site without head protection, exposing the employees to the hazard of being struck by falling object.   Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that each employee working on the job site and exposed to over-head hazards is provided and wearing head protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $200
  • · Z (S) $1800

1926.403 I02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2012
Abate by
May 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.403(i)(2)(i):   Live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by cabinets or other forms of enclosures, nor by any of the means listed in subparagraphs (A) through (D) of this paragraph:  On or about February 28, 2012, employees were plugging extension cords into the outlets below the breaker box with unused openings and exposed energized parts, exposing the employees to an electrical shock hazard.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all breaker boxes with unused openings are effectively covered.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $200
  • · Z (S) $1800

1926.405 A02 II E

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2012
Abate by
May 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(E):   Lamps used in temporary wiring for general illumination were not protected from accidental contact or breakage:  On or about February 28, 2012, employees were utilizing a temporary light set on the first floor of the building under construction without the light bulbs protected from accidental contact, exposing the employees to an electrical shock hazard.   Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that employees are protected from an electrical shock hazard by providing protective guards on each light bulb used for temporary lighting.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.405 A02 II F

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2012
Abate by
May 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(F):   Temporary lights were suspended by their electric cords when such lights and cords were not designed for suspension:  On or about February 28, 2012, employees were utilizing extension cords that were secured to the overhead metal framework on the first floor with wire ties, exposing the employees to an electrical shock hazard.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that each flexible cord used on the job site is not suspended with wire ties.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $200
  • · Z (S) $1800

1926.405 G02 IV

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2012
Abate by
May 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv):   Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  a) On or about February 28, 2012, an employee was utilizing an orange 120V extension cord to power portable tools on the first floor that was not equipped with strain relief, exposing the employees to an electrical shock hazard.  b) On or about February 28, 2012, an employee was utilizing a red 120V extension cord to power a portable drill to mix plaster on the second floor that was not equipped with strain relief, exposing the employees to an electrical shock hazard.  c) On or about February 28, 2012, employees were utilizing a yellow 120V extension cord to power temporary lighting on the first floor that was plugged into the main power source not equipped with strain relief, exposing the employees to an electrical shock hazard.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that each flexible cord utilized on the construction site is equipped with strain relief.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2012
Abate by
May 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $3,000
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1):   Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):  On or about February 28, 2012, an employee was plastering the exterior of the building under construction from tubular welded scaffolding erected up to approximately 20 feet high without the work platforms fully planked, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that each employee working on scaffolding is working from platforms that are fully planked.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $3000

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2012
Abate by
May 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii):   Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section:  On or about February 28, 2012, an employee was plastering the exterior of the building under construction from tubular welded scaffolding erected up to approximately 20 feet high without utilizing fall protection, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that each employee working on scaffolding over 10 feet high is protected from falling by the use of a personal fall arrest system or guard rail protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2012
Abate by
May 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1):   When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Cross braces were used as a means of access:  On or about February 28, 2012, an employee was climbing the sides to access the second and third tiers of the tubular welded scaffolding erected up to approximately 20 feet high without an access ladder, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that each employee accessing scaffolding is provided an access ladder.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $3000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334033024.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.