Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: BUCKINGHAM EXTERIORS

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of BUCKINGHAM EXTERIORS in 475 VERSAILLES AVENUE, FLORISSANT, MO 63034 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 334067220.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Buckingham Exteriors for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Buckingham Exteriors is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
475 VERSAILLES AVENUE
City
FLORISSANT
State
MO
ZIP
63034
Mailing
2745 BROUSTER AVENUE, OVERLAND, MO 63114
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 6, 2012
Abate by
Sep 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,700
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor  did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:      475 Versailles Avenue, Florissant: Employees working on a roof approximately 10 1/2 feet from ground level to the highest eaves did not have their personal fall arrest systems attached to any structures.  There were no other fall protection systems such as safety net systems or guardrail systems.  There was no claiim of infeasibility.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1700

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334067220.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.