Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-02

OSHA Inspection: SUMMER GARDEN FOOD MANUFACTURING

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SUMMER GARDEN FOOD MANUFACTURING in 500 MCCLURG ROAD, YOUNGSTOWN, OH 44512 (NAICS 311999). OSHA activity number 334118023.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Summer Garden Food Manufacturing for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Summer Garden Food Manufacturing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
500 MCCLURG ROAD
City
YOUNGSTOWN
State
OH
ZIP
44512
Mailing
500 MCCLURG ROAD, YOUNGSTOWN, OH 44512
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311999
Employees
73
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 8, 2012
Abate by
Jul 31, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $2,678 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    On or about May 2, 2012 the employer did not develop machine specific procedures for the Selco can compactor.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2677.5
  • · Z (S) $3825

1910.147 C04 II D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 8, 2012
Abate by
Jun 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(D): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control:    On or about May 2, 2012 the employer did not clearly outline the requirement to verify the effectiveness of the lockout/tagout procedures not limited to the palletizer.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $3825

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 8, 2012
Abate by
Jun 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:    On or about May 2, 2012 the employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure annually.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.37 B05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 8, 2012
Abate by
Jun 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(5): Each doorway or passage along an exit access that could be mistaken for an exit was not marked "Not an Exit" or similar designation, or be identified by a sign indicating its actual use (e.g. closet):    On or about May 2, 2012 the employer did not mark the doorway leading into a construction area as "not an exit".
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 8, 2012
Abate by
Jun 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through written certification that identified the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, identified the document as a certification of the hazard assessment:    On or about May 2, 2012 the employer did not verify through certification that a workplace hazard assessment had been performed identifiying the workplace evaluated.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.157 G02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 8, 2012
Abate by
Jul 31, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually:    On or about May 2, 2012 the employer did not provide training at least annually to employees required to use a fire extinguisher during incipient stage fires.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.178 Q07

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 8, 2012
Abate by
Jun 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service, or were placed in service if the examination showed conditions adversely affecting the safety of the vehicle:    On or about May 2, 2012 the employer did not have fork truck operators examine the industrial trucks before being placed in service.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334118023.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.