Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,288Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-24 Last loaded 2026-07-29

OSHA Inspection: INDUSTRIAL PROCESS EQUIPMENT CO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of INDUSTRIAL PROCESS EQUIPMENT CO in 28 LOCUST ST., SAINT LOUIS, MO 63103 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 334150224.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Industrial Process Equipment CO — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Industrial Process Equipment CO is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
28 LOCUST ST.
City
SAINT LOUIS
State
MO
ZIP
63103
Mailing
28 LOCUST ST., SAINT LOUIS, MO 63103
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332999
Employees
43
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,785 · Current $1,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):     One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    1. In the machine shop, employees were using a Sears Craftsman Contractor Series 20 inch Industrial Rated Drill Press with no arbor (chuck) guard in place over the drill bit.    2. In the warehouse, employees were using a Powermatic Drill Press with no arbor (chuck) guard in place over the drill bit.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1249.5
  • — Z (S) $1785

1910.22 D01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2012
Abate by
May 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(1):     On every building or other structure, or part thereof, used for mercantile, business, industrial or storage purposes, the loads approved by the building official were not marked on plates of approved design and securely affixed in a conspicuous place in each space to which they relate.    1. In the machine shop, there was a balcony/cat walk used for storage located ten (10) feet above the floor with no load capacity (weight limit) sign in place to indicate how weight the platform can hold.    2. In the warehouse, there was a balcony/cat walk used for storage located ten (10) feet above the floor with no load capacity (weight limit) sign in place to convey how much weight the platform can hold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.215 B09

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2012
Abate by
May 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9):     The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:    1. In the machine shop on the west wall, employees were using a Baldor grinder with no tongue guards in place to cover both grinding wheels. The distance from the grinding wheels to the top of the eye shields was one and one half (1 1/2) inches.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334150224.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.