Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: SANS POINTE, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SANS POINTE, INC. in 91 SCOTT RD., WATERBURY, CT 06705 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 334155223.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Sans Pointe, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sans Pointe, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SANS POINTE, INC.
Site address
91 SCOTT RD.
City
WATERBURY
State
CT
ZIP
06705
Mailing
PO BOX 161, MONROE, NY 10949
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2012
Abate by
Jul 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    Worksite: The employees who were installing asphalt roofing shingles with pneumatic nail guns were not wearing eye protection.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2012
Abate by
Jul 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.      Worksite:  The employees who were accessing a ladder jack scaffold platform at a height of approximately 19 feet 4 inches above the ground were not provided with a safe means of access to the platform.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2012
Abate by
Aug 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.    worksite: The ladder jack scaffold that employees were working from at a height of approximately 19 feet 4 inches above the ground was not erected under the supervision of a person competent in scaffold erection.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2012
Abate by
Jul 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.    Woksite: The employees who were working from the ladder jack scaffold platform at a height of approximately 19 feet 4 inches above the ground were not protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.454 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2012
Abate by
Aug 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer failed to have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area.    Worksite: The employees who were working from the ladder jack scaffold without fall protection at a height of approximately 19 feet 4 inches above the ground and without safe access to the scaffold platform were not trained to recognize the hazards associated with ladder jack scaffolds.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2012
Abate by
Aug 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    Worksite: The employees who were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 21 feet above the ground while working on the 6 pitch roof were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2012
Abate by
Jul 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    Worksite: The employees who were working on the 6 pitch roof with an eave height of approximately 21 feet above the ground were not protected from fall hazards by the use guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334155223.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.