Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-02

OSHA Inspection: RODRIGO MORENO

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RODRIGO MORENO in 2500 NORFOLK AVE, NORFOLK, NE 68701 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 334176831.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rodrigo Moreno for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rodrigo Moreno is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RODRIGO MORENO
Site address
2500 NORFOLK AVE
City
NORFOLK
State
NE
ZIP
68701
Mailing
14236 KARL STREET, OMAHA, NE 68137
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2012
Abate by
Aug 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.    Job site located at 2500 Norfolk Ave., Norfolk, NE-Employees engaged in residential construction 6 feet or more above a lower level were not protected from falling with the use of a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.  The employees did have full body harnesses on, but were not attached to the rope grab on the safety rope attached to the top of the church they were working on installing shake shingles.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2000
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2012
Abate by
Aug 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4):     Ladders shall be used only for the purpose for which they were designed.    Job site located at 2500 Norfolk Ave., Norfolk, NE-Employees used a section of an extension ladder as a straight ladder to access the flat section below where they were working.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $1600

View Rodrigo Moreno's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334176831.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.