Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-03

OSHA Inspection: SEVEN OAKS TRAINING CENTER, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SEVEN OAKS TRAINING CENTER, INC. in 150 RIVER ROAD, ORRINGTON, ME 04474 (NAICS 813110). OSHA activity number 334204641.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Seven Oaks Training Center, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Seven Oaks Training Center, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
150 RIVER ROAD
City
ORRINGTON
State
ME
ZIP
04474
Mailing
154 RIVER ROAD, ORRINGTON, ME 04474
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
813110
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.304 F

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2012
Abate by
May 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,920 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.304(f):     Section 5.1.3.3 American National Standards Institute 01.1-1961, Safety Code for Woodworking Machinery as adopted by 29 CFR 1926.304(f):  Electrically driven equipment was not controlled with magnetic switches or other devices that would prevent automatic restarting of the machine after a power failure:    Two Story Residential Home - An employer was operating a Skilsaw tablesaw that did not have a anti-restart safety device.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1919.84
  • · Z (S) $2400

1926.304 F

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2012
Abate by
May 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,920 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.304(f):     Section 4.1.2(b) American National Standards Institute 01.1-1961, Safety Code for Woodworking Machinery as adopted by 29 CFR 1926.304(f):  Circular hand-fed ripsaws were not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely encloses that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut:    Two Story Residential Home - An employee was operating a Skilsaw tablesaw that did not have an upper hood guard for the 10 inch circular saw blade.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1920
  • · Z (S) $2400

1926.451 C02 I

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2012
Abate by
May 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,920 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(i):     Footings were not level, sound, rigid and capable of supporting the loaded scaffold without settling or displacement:    Two Story Residential Home - Rigid footings were not provided underneath the poles of the pump jack scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1920
  • · Z (S) $2400

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2012
Abate by
May 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,240 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1):     Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:    Two Story Residential Home - The employer did ensure that upper rails and midrails were intalled on the pump jack scaffolds to protect employees from a fall of approximate of 12 feet to ground level.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2240
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2012
Abate by
May 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,240 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor  did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502.      Two Story Residential Home - Employees were working on a roof without fall protection at a height of approximately 22 feet to ground level.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2240
  • · Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334204641.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.