HINSDALE, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: ART MAY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ART MAY in 325 OAK AVE, HINSDALE, IL 60521 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 334235835.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ART MAY
- Site address
- 325 OAK AVE
- City
- HINSDALE
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60521
- Mailing
- 4326 RUBY ST., SCHILLER PARK, IL 60176
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- May 11, 2012
- Abate by
- May 18, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets. On May 9, 2012 one employee was not protected by a hard hat as he was exposed to a struck by hazard. Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19 (c).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1120
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 11, 2012
- Abate by
- May 18, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. On May 9, 2012 three employees were exposed to fall hazards between 15.5 feet and 20 feet above grade. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19 (d).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1960
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334235835.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.