GERMANTOWN, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: KITPACKERS, LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of KITPACKERS, LLC in N117 W18711 FULTON DR, GERMANTOWN, WI 53022 (NAICS 325520). OSHA activity number 334243698.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KITPACKERS, LLC
- Site address
- N117 W18711 FULTON DR
- City
- GERMANTOWN
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53022
- Mailing
- N117 W18711 FULTON DR, GERMANTOWN, WI 53022
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 325520
- Employees
- 46
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.106 D02 I
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,400 · Current $1,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(2)(i): Approved containers and portable tanks were not used: (a) In the wash area the safety container (oily waste can) approved for holding rags with flammable and combustible residue was being used for holding a flammable liquid, methyl ethyl ketone. (b) In the filling area the small plastic bottles used to dispense a flammable liquid, methyl ethyl ketone, were not approved flammable liquid containers.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $1700
- · Z (S) $3400
1910.125 E01 I
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,400 · Current $1,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.125(e)(1)(i): All electrical wiring and equipment in each vapor area and any adjacent area did not conform to the applicable hazardous (classified)-area requirements of subpart S of this part (except as specifically permitted in paragraph (g): (a) In the wash area the inline duct fan, helping to exhaust methyl ethyl ketone vapors from the area, was not approved for this class 1 location. (b) In the wash area the fluorescent light fixture was within 20 feet of the vapor area of the dip tanks which contained methy ethyl ketone.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $1700
- · Z (S) $3400
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $5,100 · Current $2,550 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes: (a) In the packaging area the packaging machine operators used disposable nitrile gloves and were handling methyl ethyl ketone solvent.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $2550
- · Z (S) $5100
1910.124 J01 I
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.124(j)(1)(i): Hoods and ductwork of the ventilation system were not inspected for corrosion or damage at least quarterly during operation: (a) In the wash department the local exhaust ventilation system used to exhaust solvent vapors from the area above the wash tanks had no quarterly inspection for corrosion and damage.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.124 J02 I
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.124(j)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure airflow was adequate at least quarterly during operation: (a) In the wash department the local exhaust ventilation system used to exhaust solvent vapors from the area above the wash tanks had no quarterly measurement for airflow.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1200 F06 II
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical: (a) In the wash department the three wash tanks were not labeled with the identity and hazards of the wash solvents they contained such as methyl ethyl ketone or isopropyl alcohol.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 325520)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334243698.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.