Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: J-TWO CONCRETE, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of J-TWO CONCRETE, INC. in 1140 GARFIELD ST., OAK PARK, IL 60304 (NAICS 238110). OSHA activity number 334244530.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch J-Two Concrete, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for J-Two Concrete, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1140 GARFIELD ST.
City
OAK PARK
State
IL
ZIP
60304
Mailing
3401 RICHMOND RD. P.O. BOX 1194, MCHENRY, IL 60051
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238110
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 8, 2012
Abate by
Jun 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):  Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:    a)  Employee exposed to struck-by hazards that could result in eye injury was not wearing safety glasses.    b) Employee exposed to struck-by hazards that could result in eye injury was not wearing side shields for persciption safety glasses.    c) Employee exposed to radiant energy while torch cutting was not wearing proper eye protection.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 8, 2012
Abate by
Jun 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1):  Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    a)  Employees performing concrete work were exposed to fall hazards of up to approximately 16.5 feet    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 8, 2012
Abate by
Sep 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):  The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:     a)  Employees exposed to fall hazards were not provided the training needed to recognize and correct those hazards.     In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1412 D01

Serious Gravity 5 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 8, 2012
Abate by
Sep 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1412(d)(1): A visual inspection by a competent person(s) was not conducted prior to each shift the equipment was used. Apparent deficiencies in the items noted in 1926.1412(d)(1)(i) thru (xiv), at a minimum, were not observed:    The employer failed to ensure that an adequate visual inspection of the Terex BT-3800 truck mounted crane was made by the competent person prior to each shift in the following instances:    a) The latch of the load hook did not function properly. It did not close against the hook.    b) Poor ground conditions allowed for the cribbing to break under the pressure of the outrigger.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.1412 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 8, 2012
Abate by
Sep 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1412(e)(1): The equipment in service was not inspected each month in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section:    a) Monthly inspections of the Terex BT-3800 truck mounted crane were not conducted.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1412 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 8, 2012
Abate by
Sep 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1412(f)(2): The equipment was not inspected by a qualified person at least every 12 months in accordance with paragraphs (f)(2)(i) -- (xxi) of this section:     a) Annual inspections of the Terex BT-3800 truck mounted crane were not conducted.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1417 A

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 8, 2012
Abate by
Jun 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1417(a): The employer did not comply with all manufacturer procedures applicable to the operational functions of equipment, including its use with attachments:    The employer did not comply with all the manufacturer procedures when using the Terex BT-3800 truck mounted crane at the job site in the following instances:    a) The boom tip was not directly above the load per manufacturer procedures.    b) The load was not freely suspended per manufacturer procedures.    c) The cribbing was not of adequate material per manufacturer procedures.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.1428 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 8, 2012
Abate by
Sep 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1428(a): The employer did not ensure that each signal person met the Qualification Requirements (paragraph (c) of this section) prior to giving any signals:    a) The employer did not provide a qualified signal person for the crane operator.     In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View J-Two Concrete, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334244530.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.