NEW HAVEN, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: THE HANDYMAN WORKSHOP, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of THE HANDYMAN WORKSHOP, LLC in 459 ORANGE STREET, NEW HAVEN, CT 06510 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 334244910.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- THE HANDYMAN WORKSHOP, LLC
- Site address
- 459 ORANGE STREET
- City
- NEW HAVEN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06510
- Mailing
- 362 REEDS GAP ROAD, NORTHFORD, CT 06472
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Jun 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii) Jobsite: The fabricated scaffold platform that employees were working from at heights of approximately 20 feet 1 inch feet above the ground were not fully planked.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $840
- · Z (S) $1200
1926.451 G04
- Issued
- Jun 20, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4): Guardrail systems installed to meet the requirements of this section did not comply with the provisions listed in subparagraphs (i) through (xv) of this paragraph. Jobsite: The guardrail system, installed on the scaffold plank at approximately 20 feet 1 inch from the lower level was missing the intermediate mid rail or an equivalent measures was utilized.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jun 20, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder���s length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Jobsite: The extension ladder that was used to gain access to the roof did not have its side rails extended 3 feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1120
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Jun 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. Jobsite: The employer did not maintain a written certification record of employees who were trained in fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334244910.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.