HOUSTON, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: SANCHEZ REMODELACIONES
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SANCHEZ REMODELACIONES in GRASSY VIEW DRIVE, HOUSTON, TX 77073 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 334248937.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SANCHEZ REMODELACIONES
- Site address
- GRASSY VIEW DRIVE
- City
- HOUSTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77073
- Mailing
- 11708 EZEKIEL ROAD, TOMBALL, TX 77375
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.405 G02 III
- Issued
- May 31, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not used in continuous lengths without splice or tap: The employer does not provide flexible cords without splice or tap. This violation was observed on or about May 9, 2012, on the east side of a newly built house where employees were exposed to an electrical hazard when required to use a flexible cord without a splice or tap.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1200
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- May 31, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: The employer does not provide the scaffold with base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation. This violation was observed on or about May 9, 2012, on the east side of a newly built house where employees were exposed to a fall hazard when required to work on the platform at a height of 13 feet without base plates, mud sills or firm foundation.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- May 31, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, stucture, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. The employer does not provide employees with access to the scaffold.. This violation was observed on or about May 9, 2012, on the east side of a newly built house where employees were exposed to a fall hazard when accessing the platform without a ladder.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.451 G04 I
- Issued
- May 31, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms. The employer does not install guard rails on the scaffold. This violation was observed on or about May 9, 2011, on the east side of a newly built house where employees were exposed to a fall hazard when required to nail vinyl siding from a platform of 13 feet without a guard rail system.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.452 J02
- Issued
- May 31, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary. The employer does not require that pump jack scaffold be secured to the structure by rigid trianagular bracing at the bottom, top and other points as necessary. This violation was observed on or about May 9, 2012 in the residential housing area where employees were exposed to a fall hazard when required to work from the pump jack scaffold without being secured to the structure.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334248937.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.