ELMWOOD PARK, NJ ·
OSHA Inspection: SAENZ CONTRACTORS INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SAENZ CONTRACTORS INC. in 400 RIVERFRONT BLV, ELMWOOD PARK, NJ 07407 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 334254547.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SAENZ CONTRACTORS INC.
- Site address
- 400 RIVERFRONT BLV
- City
- ELMWOOD PARK
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07407
- Mailing
- 484 GENESEE ST, TRENTON, NJ 08611
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Jun 22, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. a) 4th floor: Employees were accessing the roof from a landing that was approximately 9 feet above the lower floor and did not have a guard rail system or other means of fall protection in place, on or about 2/04/2012.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4200
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 22, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b) Note: If using these systems was infeasible or created a greater hazard, the employer should develop and implement a fall protection plan meeting the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. a) Roof level.: An employee engaged in roofing work without any means of fall protection was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 40 feet, on or about 2/3/2012.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4200
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jun 22, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Because of the portable ladder's length, the ladder side rails did not extend to at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access a) 4th floor: Employees were using a part of an extension ladder that did not extend 3 feet above the landing, on or about 2/04/2012.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4200
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Jun 22, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: a) Employees were using the upper section of an extension ladder as a standalone ladder to access the roof, on or about 2/3/2012.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2400
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334254547.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.