PAWNEE, IL —
OSHA Inspection: FOUR K CONSTRUCTION INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FOUR K CONSTRUCTION INC. in 15295 S PAWNEE RD, PAWNEE, IL 62558 (NAICS 321992). OSHA activity number 334254919.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FOUR K CONSTRUCTION INC.
- Site address
- 15295 S PAWNEE RD
- City
- PAWNEE
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62558
- Mailing
- 210 CARROLL ST, PAWNEE, IL 62558
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 321992
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Jun 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by successful completion of training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): Employees were operating the powered industrial trucks and the employer did not have a training program to ensure the employees can operate the powered industrial trucks safely.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Jun 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph (l) and shall include the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation: Employees operate powered industrial trucks and the employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Jun 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part: Employees were exposed to fall hazards and the employer did not have a safety and health program that addressed areas such as, but not limited to, fall protection and electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $600
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jun 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not provide frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment by a competent person: Employees were exposed to electrical hazards and the employer did not ensure frequent and regular inspections of the site were performed by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.404 B01 I
- Issued
- Jun 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): Employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites: Employees were exposed to electrical hazards because of the lack of GFCI protection on the electrical outlet while using a circular saw. The electricla equipment, tools and extension cord were not part of an assured equipment grounding conductor program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Jun 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level was not protected from falling to that lower level: Employees working from the scaffold platforms attached to the John Deere forklifts were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 12.0 feet above he ground below because of the lack of fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Jun 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards: Employees working from the scaffold platforms attached to the John Deere forklifts were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 12.0 feet above the ground below and the employer had not provided training to the employees on the hazards associated with working off scaffold platforms and the procedures to minimize those hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 321992)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334254919.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.