Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: GENE'S RENTAL CENTER INCORPORATED

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of GENE'S RENTAL CENTER INCORPORATED in 525 ORANGE CENTER ROAD, ORANGE, CT 06477 (NAICS 424990). OSHA activity number 334294113.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Gene'S Rental Center Incorporated for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Gene'S Rental Center Incorporated is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
525 ORANGE CENTER ROAD
City
ORANGE
State
CT
ZIP
06477
Mailing
304 BOSTON POST ROAD, ORANGE, CT 06477
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424990
Employees
35
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 28, 2012
Abate by
Oct 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l).    Location: 304 Boston Post Road, Orange, CT 06477    Each operator of the Clark, type LP, sit down type powered industrial truck had not successfully completed a powered industrial truck training program and evaluation as outlined in paragraph (l).    Each operator of the Raymond walk behind powered industrial truck (pallet jack) had not successfully completed a powered industrial truck training program and evaluation as outlines in paragraph (l).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2450
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 28, 2012
Abate by
Oct 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    Location: 304 Boston Post Road, Orange, CT 06477    A written hazard communications program was not developed and implemented for the products and chemicals used in the workplace such ass but not limited to tent washer, gasoline, Steri-Fab, acetylene, oxygen, diesel fuel and helium.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1470
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 28, 2012
Abate by
Oct 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    Location: 304 Boston Post Road, Orange, CT 06477    Training and information on the hazards associated with the products and chemicals in the workplace was not conducted with employees at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced into the work area.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 28, 2012
Abate by
Oct 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through written certification that identified the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, identified the document as a certification of the hazard assessment.    Location: 304 Boston Post Road, Orange, CT 06477    A written workplace hazard assessment with written certification was not performed to identify the hazards associated with all the work tasks and the necessary personal protective equipment required for each job task.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.132 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 28, 2012
Abate by
Oct 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment and did not verify that each affected employee has received and understood the required personal protective equipment training through a written certification that contains the name of each employee trained, the date(s) of training, and that identifies the subject of the certification.    Location: 304 Boston Post Road, Orange, CT 06477    Each employee who was required to wear personal protective equipment was not provided with training on the proper use of personal protective equiipment, when personal protective equipment is necessary, the limitations of personal protective equipment and the proper care, maintenance, useful life and disposal of the personal protective equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334294113.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.