VIDALIA, GA ·
OSHA Inspection: TERRY HALE, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TERRY HALE, INC. in 1101 EAST FIRST STREET, VIDALIA, GA 30474 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 334314317.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TERRY HALE, INC.
- Site address
- 1101 EAST FIRST STREET
- City
- VIDALIA
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30474
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 1133, ADAIRSVILLE, GA 30103
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238310
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jun 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: Along the Bi-Lo store-front, on or about May 15, 2012, hard hats were not worn by employees who were exposed to being struck-by construction tools and materials while working below elevated work.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $680
- · Z (S) $1360
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Jun 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: Along the Bi-Lo store-front, on or about May 15, 2012, employees who were working while standing in an aerial lift platform were not protected with a harness and lanyard that was tied-off to the platform, resulting in an eleven-foot fall hazard. Abatement Note: As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated under 1926.502(e).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $800
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Jun 1, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 8, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: Along the Bi-Lo store-front, on or about May 15, 2012, no guardrails or other forms of fall protection were provided for employees who were working while standing on the roof, resulting in a fourteen-foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238310)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334314317.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.