O FALLON, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: TJ ROOFING LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of TJ ROOFING LLC in 1126 ELIZABETH, O FALLON, IL 62269 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 334332111.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TJ ROOFING LLC
- Site address
- 1126 ELIZABETH
- City
- O FALLON
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62269
- Mailing
- 11938 LOXLEY LN, MARYLAND HEIGHTS, MO 63043
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: a) For Citation 1, Item 1a, issued on 7/25/2012 with an abatement date of 8/15/2012, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation. b) For Citation 1, Item 1b, issued on 7/25/2012 with an abatement date of 8/15/2012, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $400
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. For Citation 1, Item 2, issued on 7/25/2012 with an abatement date of 7/26/2012, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $400
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part. Employees working from a six in twelve pitch roof were exposed to falls of approximately 18 feet to a lower level. The employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program to control and eliminate the hazards present at the jobsite in accordance with the OSHA regulations.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s) Employees working from a six in twelve pitch roof were exposed to falls of approximately 18 feet to a lower level. The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b) Note: If using these systems was infeasible or created a greater hazard, the employer should develop and implement a fall protection plan meeting the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Employees working from a six in twelve pitch roof were exposed to falls of approximately 18 feet to a lower level. Employees were not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or a personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections at TJ Roofing LLC
View TJ Roofing LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334332111.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.