Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: J FERGUSON CONSTRUCTION INC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of J FERGUSON CONSTRUCTION INC in 6851 WEST FREEWAY, FORT WORTH, TX 76116 (NAICS 238190). OSHA activity number 334335312.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch J Ferguson Construction INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for J Ferguson Construction INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6851 WEST FREEWAY
City
FORT WORTH
State
TX
ZIP
76116
Mailing
711 W PARK AVE, WEATHERFORD, TX 76086
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238190
Employees
35
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 5, 2012
Abate by
Sep 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:        On or about May 17, 2012, employees working directly below workers installing siding above them were exposed to being struck-by falling tools and/or materials and were not wearing protective helmets.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4200

1926.451 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 5, 2012
Abate by
Sep 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(1): Each employee on a scaffold was not provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects through the installation of toeboards, screens, guardrail systems, or through the erection of debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures that contain or deflect the falling objects.  For falling objects too large, heavy or massive to be contained or deflected, the employer did not place and secure such potential falling objects away from the edge of the surface from which they could fall.      On or about May 17, 2012, employees installing siding on or near a six (6) tier tubular welded frame scaffold that was not equipped with toeboards were exposed to being struck by falling objects such as tools and/or materials.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 5, 2012
Abate by
Sep 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person:         On or about May 17, 2012, Employees installing siding from a (6) tier tubular welded frame scaffolds that was not designed by a qualified person were exposed to a fall hazard of up to 33 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3500

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 5, 2012
Abate by
Sep 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.        On or about May 17, 2012, employees installing siding from a (6) tier tubular welded frame scaffold did not have acceptable access to the upper levels of the platform. The employees were exposed to falls of up to (33) feet to the ground.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3500

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 5, 2012
Abate by
Sep 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.        On or about May 17, 2012, employees installing siding from a (6) tier tubular welded frame scaffold that was not equipped with all the required guardrails were exposed to fall hazards of up to (33) feet to the ground.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4900

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 5, 2012
Abate by
Sep 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v) A body belt shall be worn and a lanyard attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift. Note to paragraph (b)(2)(v): As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated under 1926.502(e).        On or about May 17, 2012, an employee working from aerial lift was not utilizing fall protection. Employee was exposed to a fall of more than (18) feet to the ground.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3500

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 5, 2012
Abate by
Sep 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface (horizontal and vertical surface) with an unprotected side or edge which is 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.      On or about May 17, 2012, employees performing siding installation activities while working from a 6:12 pitch roof were exposed to fall hazards of (40) feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4900

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334335312.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.