SUNRAY, TX —
OSHA Inspection: VALERO MCKEE REFINERY
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of VALERO MCKEE REFINERY in 6701 FM 119, SUNRAY, TX 79086 (NAICS 324110). OSHA activity number 334388329.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VALERO MCKEE REFINERY
- Site address
- 6701 FM 119
- City
- SUNRAY
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79086
- Mailing
- HCR BOX 36, SUNRAY, TX 79086
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 324110
- Employees
- 450
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
14 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 B01
- Issued
- Nov 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,300 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(b)(1): Aisles and passageways were not kept clear and in good repair, with no obstruction across or in aisles that could create a hazard: On or about June 1, 2012, and at times prior thereto, at the Alky/PDA Unit, there were three instances where temporary piping created a tripping hazard along the passageways: a) PDA Unit 250, two 1/4-inch stainless steel pipes supplying pressure and fuel sweetener to the unit, laid above ground approximately 3-inches to 7-inches above the ground along the passageways to the unit. Employees were exposed to trip hazards. b) Alky Unit 350, approximately 42-feet of temporary 2-inch drainage pipe laid across the entry to the unit sat approximately 3 to 7-inches above ground. Employees were exposed to trip hazards. c) Alky Unit 350, temporary 4-inch drainage pipe used to transfer excess water to the trash box laid across the entry to the unit approximately 4-inches above ground. Employees were exposed to trip hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $3300
- — Z (S) $3300
1910.106 B01 V B
- Issued
- Nov 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,300 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(b)(1)(v)(b): Pressure vessels were not built in accordance with the Code for Unfired Pressure Vessels, Section VIII of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code 1968: On or about June 1, 2012, and at times prior thereto, at the Alky/PDA Unit, the employer operated pressure vessels and did not ensure the vessels were built in accordance with the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII. a) The employer failed to ensure that pressure vessel V-5 in the Alky/PDA Unit has a legible manufacturer nameplate attached. b) The employer failed to ensure that pressure vessel V-10 in the Alky/PDA Unit has a legible manufacturer nameplate attached. c) The employer failed to ensure that pressure vessel T-1 in the Alky/PDA Unit has a legible manufacturer nameplate attached.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $3300
- — Z (S) $3300
1910.119 J04 I
- Issued
- Nov 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(i): Inspections and tests were not performed on process equipment: On or about June 1, 2012, and at times prior thereto, two instances where the employer did not perform inspections of process equipment and did not assure its safe operation: a) Valero failed to inspect and correct deficiencies on vessel V5 of the Alky/PDA. b) Valero failed to inspect and correct deficiencies on vessel V10 of the Alky/PDA.
Recent events (3)
- — 3 (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.119 D03 II
- Issued
- Nov 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $1,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices: On or about June 1, 2012, and at times prior thereto, two instances where the employer did not document equipment that complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices: b) The employer failed to document that process equipment in the Alky/Propane De-asphalter Unit complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, in that the employer failed to implement the Overpressure Protection Car-Seal Policy and Procedure to identify, install and properly maintain the secured open position on the 4-inch manual valve on the Low Pressure Asphalt Stripper T-108 overhead stream.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $1500
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.119 E03 IV
- Issued
- Nov 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $5,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(iv): The process hazard analysis did not address the consequences of failure of engineering and administrative controls: On or about June 1, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not address the consequences of closing an intervening valve on a line upstream of a relief device when it conducted the PHA for the Alky/PDA Unit and did not consider the block valve in the vent line of the Low Pressure Condensate Pot in the Alky/PDA Unit.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $5500
- — Z (S) $5500
1910.147 D06
- Issued
- Nov 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(6): Prior to starting work on equipment that has been locked out, the authorized employee did not verify that isolation and deenergization of the equipment had been accomplished. On or about June 1, 2012, the employer did not confirm that the employee adequately verified the isolation of the 10 inch settler effluent line to ensure so far as possible that all sulfuric acid had been removed.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $7000
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.119 J04 III
- Issued
- Nov 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(iii): The frequency of inspections and tests of process equipment was not consistent with applicable manufacturers' recommendations and good engineering practices, and more frequently if determined to be necessary by prior operating experience: On or about June 1, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not perform inspections and tests on process equipment with adequate frequency to assure its mechanical integrity. This was observed when the employer did not ensure that inspections and tests of process equipment occurred with the necessary frequency, such as but not limited to the following: c) The employer does not ensure adequate frequency of visual inspection utilized for piping in the PDA Unit, such as but not limited to the piping to the Recovery Light Ends Compressor. h) The employer did not conduct visual inspections at adequate frequency to identify and correct damaged and or missing paint (external coatings) on piping in the Crude Unit. Valero failed to timely conduct a visual inspection of the Recovery Light End Compressor.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $1000
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.119 J04 I
- Issued
- Nov 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(i): Inspections and tests were not performed on process equipment: On or about June 1, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not perform inspections of process equipment and did not assure its safe operation when: a) Valero failed to inspect and correct deficiencies of the Low Pressure Condensate Pot of the Alky/PDA. Valero failed to timely correct deficiencies of the Low Pressure Condensate Pot of the Alky/PDA.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.119 J05
- Issued
- Nov 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer did not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits (defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of this section) before further use or in a safe and timely manner when necessary means are taken to assure safe operation: On or about June 1, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not correct deficiencies for the following: a) The employer operated the pipe to the C101 Recovery Light Ends Compressor of the Propane De-Asphalter Unit without the pipe being properly supported. b) The employer operated piping connected to the #1 and #2 Reactors in the Iso-Octene Unit with deficiencies present that allowed loss of primary containment of flammable hydrocarbons. c) The employer operated piping in Crude Unit that was improperly supported. f) The employer operated the Crude Unit with a deficient pipe support structure (pipe rack) missing several components necessary to ensure the integrity of the structure.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $5000
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.106 C04
- Issued
- Nov 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(c)(4): Piping systems were not substantially supported and protected against physical damage and excessive stresses arising from settlement, vibration, expansion, or contraction: On or about June 1, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer operated deficient process equipment in the Propane De-Asphalting Unit (PDA), where a 6-inch diameter horizontal pipe of approximately 10 feet long had a pipe shoe not contacting its support plate, causing the pipe to vibrate, pulsate and noticeably swinging from side to side.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $1000
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.119 J05
- Issued
- Nov 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): Equipment deficiencies. The employer did not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits (defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of this section) before further use or in a safe and timely manner when necessary means are taken to assure safe operation: On or about June 1, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer operated deficient process equipment in the Propane De-Asphalting Unit (PDA), where a 6-inch diameter horizontal pipe of approximately 10 feet long had a pipe shoe not contacting its support plate, causing the pipe to vibrate, pulsate and noticeably swinging from side to side.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.119 L05
- Issued
- Nov 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(l)(5): If a change covered by this paragraph resulted in a change in the operating procedures or practices required by paragraph (f) of this section, such procedures or practices were not be updated accordingly: On or about June 1, 2012: (a) The Fluid Catalytic Cracker Unit (FCCU) operating procedures were not updated. (b) The FCCU de-inventory procedures were not implemented.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $7000
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.119 L02 III
- Issued
- Nov 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(l)(2)(iii): The Employer did not establish and implement written procedures to manage changes that affect a covered process when modifications to operating procedures were made: On or about June 1, 2012, and at times prior thereto, two instances where the employer did not implement management change procedures to ensure that modifications to operating procedures were addressed prior to making changes to facilities that affect a covered process: a) The employer commissioned the FGR Unit, which affected the FCCU by changing the location and process by which the FCCU is de-inventoried. b) The employer did not modify the FCCU operating procedures to guide the operators' actions to safely de-inventory the FCCU to the M-60 Tank.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.27 D01 IV
- Issued
- Nov 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
1910.27(d)(1)(iv): Cage(s) did not extend down the ladder to a point not less than 7 feet nor more than 8 feet above the base of the ladder: On or about June 1, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the #2 Vacuum Heater Tower Ladder equipped with a cage that did not extend down to a point not less than 7 feet nor more than 8 feet above the base of the ladder. The bottom of the cage ended approximately 9-feet, 5-inches above the base of the ladder.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Valero Mckee Refinery
View Valero Mckee Refinery's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 324110)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334388329.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.