Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: EUGENIO PAINTING CO

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of EUGENIO PAINTING CO in 1000 EAST LINCOLN HIGHWAY, CHICAGO HEIGHTS, IL 60411 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 334391711.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Eugenio Painting CO — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Eugenio Painting CO is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
EUGENIO PAINTING CO
Site address
1000 EAST LINCOLN HIGHWAY
City
CHICAGO HEIGHTS
State
IL
ZIP
60411
Mailing
1935 VERNIER, GROSSE POINTE WOODS, MI 48236
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238320
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

14 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2012
Abate by
Sep 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,310 · Current $1,617 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): General. The employer shall provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.    a. On or about May 18, 2012, at the above addressed jobsite, the employees conducting paint removal operations were not provided with medical evaluations when required to wear tight fitting N95 respirators, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with respirator use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1617
  • — Z (S) $2310

1910.134 F

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2012
Abate by
Sep 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1910.134(f): Fit testing. This paragraph requires that, before an employee may be required to use any respirator with a negative or positive pressure tight-fitting facepiece, the employee must be fit tested with the same make, model, style, and size of respirator that will be used. This paragraph specifies the kinds of fit tests allowed, the procedures for conducting them, and how the results of the fit tests must be used.    a.  On or about May 18, 2012, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were conducting paint removal operations on steel coated with lead based paint while wearing tight fitting respirators. The employer did not provide employees with a quantitative or qualitative fit test, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with lead.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.62 D01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $2,156 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(i): Each employer who has a workplace or operation covered by this standard shall initially determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level.    a.  On or about May 18, 2012, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were conducting paint removal operations on steel coated with lead based paint.  The employer did not collect personal samples to determine employee(s) exposure to lead, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with lead.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2156
  • — Z (S) $3080

1926.62 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(iii): With the exception of monitoring under paragraph (d)(3), where monitoring is required under this section, the employer shall collect personal samples representative of a full shift including at least one sample for each job classification in each work area either for each shift or for the shift with the highest exposure level.    a.  On or about May 18, 2012, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were conducting paint removal operations on steel coated with lead based paint.  The employer did not collect personal samples for employees exposure, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with lead.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.62 D02 V B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,310 · Current $1,617 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(B): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under paragraph (d) of this section and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not assure appropriate personal protective work clothing (PWC) and equipment was used in accordance with paragraph (g) of this section:    a.  On or about May 18, 2012, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were conducting paint removal operations on steel coated with lead based paint and the employer did not assure appropriate protective work clothing was used, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with lead.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1617
  • — Z (S) $2310

1926.62 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(g)(1): To prevent contamination of the employee and employees garments the employer did not provide at no cost to the employee coveralls or similar full body clothing and assure there use where employees are exposed to lead above the PEL without regard to the use of respirators:    a.  On or about May 18, 2012, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were conducting paint removal operations on steel coated with lead paint. The employer did not provide appropriate protective clothing, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with lead.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.62 G01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(g)(1)(ii):  The employer did not provide gloves, hats, and shoes or disposable shoe coverlets:    a.  On or about May 18, 2012, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were conducting paint removal operations on steel coated with lead based paint.  The employer did not provide shoes or disposable shoe covers, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with lead.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.62 D02 V C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $2,156 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(C):  The employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in paragraphs (d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii) and (d)(2)(iv) of this section interim protection such as change areas in accordance with paragraph (i)(2) of this section:    a. On or about May 18, 2012, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were conducting paint removal operations on steel coated with lead based paint and the employer did not provide change areas, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with lead.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2156
  • — Z (S) $3080

1926.62 I02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(i)(2)(i): The employer shall provide clean change areas for employees whose airborne exposure to lead is above the PEL, and as interim protection for employees performing tasks as specified in paragraph (d)(2) of this section, without regard to the use of respirators.    a.  On or about May 18, 2012, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were conducting paint removal operations on steel coated with lead based paint.  Employees were not provided with clean change areas, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with lead.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.62 D02 V E

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2012
Penalty
Initial $5,390 · Current $3,773 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(E): Biological monitoring in accordance with paragraph (j)(1)(i) of this section, to consist of blood sampling and analysis for lead and zinc protoporphyrin levels:    a.  On or about May 18, 2012, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were conducting paint removal operations on steel coated with lead based paint and the employer did not assure biological monitoring of employees was conducted, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with lead.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3773
  • — Z (S) $5390

1926.62 J01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(j)(1)(i): The employer shall make available initial medical surveillance to employees occupationally exposed on any day to lead at or above the action level. Initial medical surveillance consists of biological monitoring in the form of blood sampling and analysis for lead and zinc protoporphyrin levels.    a.  On or about May 18, 2012, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were conducting paint removal operations on steel coated with lead based paint and the employer did not assure biological monitoring of employees was conducted, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with lead.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.62 E02 II A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $2,156 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(e)(2)(ii)(A): A description of each activity in which lead is emitted; e.g. equipment used, material involved, controls in place, crew size, employee job responsibilities, operating procedures and maintenance practices;    a. On or about May 18, 2012, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were conducting needle gun operations on steel coated with lead paint and the employer did not provide a written description of the activity, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with lead.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2156
  • — Z (S) $3080

1926.62 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2012
Abate by
Sep 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $2,156 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(h)(1): "All surfaces shall be maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead".    a.  On or about May 18, 2012, at the above addressed jobsite, employees did not maintain all surfaces as free as practicable of accumulations of lead dust, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with lead
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2156
  • — Z (S) $3080

1926.62 H02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(h)(2): Clean-up of floors and other surfaces where lead accumulates shall wherever possible, be cleaned by vacuuming or other methods that minimize the likelihood of lead becoming airborne.     a.  On or about May 18, 2012, at the above addressed jobsite, employees dry swept paint chips off the working surface, thereby exposing the employees to the hazards associated with lead.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Eugenio Painting CO's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334391711.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.