Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: A B SEALER INC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of A B SEALER INC in N7212 FARWELL DRIVE, BEAVER DAM, WI 53916 (NAICS 333993). OSHA activity number 334420130.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch A B Sealer INC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for A B Sealer INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
A B SEALER INC
Site address
N7212 FARWELL DRIVE
City
BEAVER DAM
State
WI
ZIP
53916
Mailing
P.O BOX 635, BEAVER DAM, WI 53916
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333993
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 4, 2012
Abate by
Oct 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): Energy control program. The employer did not establish a program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performs any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative.                      The company did not establish an energy control program for employees who operate, service and/or maintain equipment such as the manual lathe machine.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.147 C07 I B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 4, 2012
Abate by
Oct 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(B): Each affected employee were not instructed in the purpose and use of the energy control procedure.                      Employees operating the manual lathe machine were not provided energy control training prior to operating, servicing and/or maintaining the machinery.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 4, 2012
Abate by
Oct 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l).                        The Employer did not ensure that employees operating fork lift trucks were competent on fork lift truck operation prior to operating it.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 4, 2012
Abate by
Oct 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding were not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc.                      Employees operating the lathe machine were exposed to rotating parts on the equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 4, 2012
Abate by
Oct 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:                      Employers did not develop a written hazard communication program for employees who are working with and handling chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334420130.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.