LA CROSSE, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: EAGLE ROOFING LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EAGLE ROOFING LLC in 1906 ROSE STREET, LA CROSSE, WI 54603 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 334430741.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EAGLE ROOFING LLC
- Site address
- 1906 ROSE STREET
- City
- LA CROSSE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54603
- Mailing
- 427 CHARLES AVE, SAINT PAUL, MN 55113
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: Note: As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated An employee was working out of an articulating boom platform with no fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. Employees were not trained in the hazards associated with falls in articulating boom platform.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arr Employees were working form a low sloped roof at a height greater than 6 feet with no fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Employees who were exposed to fall hazards were not trained in fall protection procedures to recognize and minimize those hazards.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334430741.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.