SPRINGFIELD, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: THOMAS HURT
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of THOMAS HURT in 3801 BLUESTEM CT, SPRINGFIELD, IL 62712 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 334437977.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- THOMAS HURT
- Site address
- 3801 BLUESTEM CT
- City
- SPRINGFIELD
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62712
- Mailing
- 120 E MADISON, RIVERTON, IL 62561
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jun 15, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 18, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,870 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not provide frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment by a competent person: Employees were exposed to eye injuries and the employer did not ensure frequent and regular inspections of the site were performed by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $1870
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jun 15, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 18, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury: Employees were exposed to eye injuries while using hand staplers and the employer did not ensure the use of proper eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 15, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 18, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,244 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor was an alternative fall protection plan which meets the requirements of 29 CFR 1926.502(k) developed and implemented: Employees were exposed to fall hazards while performing roofing activities because of the lack of fall protection. The employees were exposed to a fall distance of 9.0 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2244
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334437977.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.