Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FRANK GONZALES

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of FRANK GONZALES in 4032 E SOUTHCROSS, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78222 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 334473170.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Frank Gonzales — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Frank Gonzales is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FRANK GONZALES
Site address
4032 E SOUTHCROSS
City
SAN ANTONIO
State
TX
ZIP
78222
Mailing
2929 RIGSBY APT 3101, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78222
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1101 F02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 6, 2012
Abate by
Sep 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $1,800

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(2)(i):  The employer failed to ensure that the exposure assessment by a "competent person" was conducted in time to comply with requirements which are triggered by the exposure data or the lack of a negative exposure assessment:      The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, the employer did not perform an exposure assessment by a "competent person" prior to employees installing medicine cabinets in building 38 and sprayed on popcorn ceiling contained damaged asbestos.  This Condition exposed employees to inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1800

1926.1101 I01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 6, 2012
Abate by
Sep 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $1,800

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(i)(1):  The employer did not provide and require the use of protective clothing, such as coveralls or similar whole-body clothing, head coverings, gloves, and foot coverings for each employee exposed to airborne concentrations of asbestos that exceed the time weighted average and/or excursion limit in 29 CFR 1926.1101(c) or for which a required negative exposure assessment was not produced:         The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012, the employer did not provide appropriate protective clothing for employees working in building 38 which contained damaged asbestos ceiling and a negative exposure assessment was not conducted.  This condition potentially exposed employees to airborne asbestos fibers.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1800

1926.1101 K03 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 6, 2012
Abate by
Sep 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(3)(i):  Before the employer permitted its own employees to perform work subject to this standard in areas containing asbestos-containing material (ACM) and presumed asbestos-containing material (PACM), the employer did not identify the presence, location and quantity of asbestos containing material and/or presumed asbestos containing material therein pursuant to 29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(1):         The Reserves at Pecan Valley:  On or about March 9, 2012, the employer did not identify the presence, location, and quantity of ACM and PACM prior to employees working in building 38 which contained damaged asbestos ceiling.  This condition potentially exposed employees to airborne asbestos fibers.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4200

1926.1101 K03 II B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 6, 2012
Abate by
Sep 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(3)(ii(B)):  Before work under this standard was performed employers of employees who were performing such work did not inform the employees who were performing such work and employers of employees who were working in adjacent areas:         The Reserves at Pecan Valley:  On or about March 9, 2012, the employer did not notify his employees that ACM and PACM was present in damaged condition prior to employees working in building 38.  This condition potentially exposed employees to airborne asbestos fibers.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 K09 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 6, 2012
Abate by
Sep 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $1,800

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(9)(i): The employer did not institute, at no cost to employees, a training program for all employees who were likely to be exposed in excess of the PEL and for all employees who performed Class I through IV asbestos operations:         The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012, the employer did not provide employees working inside building 38 and asbestos containing ceiling material was in damaged condition with asbestos training regarding the hazards of asbestos and the proper methods for class IV work.  This condition potentially exposed employees to airborne asbestos fibers.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334473170.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.