OSHA Inspection: LUIS LOZADA

Issued

Sep 6, 2012

Abate by

Sep 11, 2012

Penalty

Initial $3,000 · Current $1,800 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1101(d)(2):  Asbestos hazards at a multi-employer work site was not abated by the contractor who created or controls the source of asbestos contamination:    a)   The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012, Luis Lozada did not abate the source of asbestos contamination in apartment units in which asbestos containing ceiling and linoleum flooring was in deteriorated condition in Building 5.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    b)   The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012, Luis Lozada did not abate the source of asbestos contamination in apartment units in which asbestos containing ceiling and linoleum flooring was in deteriorated condition in Building 6.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    c)   The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012, Luis Lozada did not abate the source of asbestos contamination in apartment units in which asbestos containing ceiling and linoleum flooring was in deteriorated condition in Building 8.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    d)   The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012, Luis Lozada did not abate the source of asbestos contamination in apartment units in which asbestos containing ceiling and linoleum flooring was in deteriorated condition in Building 9.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    e)   The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012, Luis Lozada did not abate the source of asbestos contamination in apartment units in which asbestos containing ceiling and linoleum flooring was in deteriorated condition in the day care building.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.

Issued

Sep 6, 2012

Abate by

Sep 11, 2012

Penalty

Initial $1,800 · Current $1,080 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1101(e)(1):  All Class I, II, and III asbestos work was not conducted within regulated areas:    a)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not ensure that building materials containing class I removal of asbestos ceiling material from building 5, was not conducted within regulated areas.  This condition exposed employees to inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    b)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not ensure that building materials containing class I removal of asbestos ceiling material from building 6, was not conducted within regulated areas.  This condition exposed employees to inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    c)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not ensure that building materials containing class I removal of asbestos ceiling material from building 8, was not conducted within regulated areas.  This condition exposed employees to inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    d)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not ensure that building materials containing class I removal of asbestos ceiling material from building 9, was not conducted within regulated areas.  This condition exposed employees to inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    e)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not ensure that building materials containing class I removal of asbestos ceiling material from the daycare building was not conducted within regulated areas.  This condition exposed employees to inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.

Issued

Sep 6, 2012

Abate by

Sep 11, 2012

Penalty

Initial $1,800 · Current $1,080 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(1)(i):  Where exposure monitoring was required under 29 CFR 1926.1101, the employer did not perform monitoring to determine accurately the airborne concentrations of asbestos to which employees were or potentially were exposed:    a)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not monitor for the concentration of airborne asbestos when employees were disturbing and removing asbestos containing ceiling material, linoleum flooring, and mastic from building 5. This condition exposed employees to the potential inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    b)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not monitor for the concentration of airborne asbestos when employees were disturbing and removing asbestos containing ceiling material, linoleum flooring, and mastic from building 6.  This condition exposed employees to the potential inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    c)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not monitor for the concentration of airborne asbestos when employees were disturbing and removing asbestos containing ceiling material, linoleum flooring, and mastic from building 8.  This condition exposed employees to the potential inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    d)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not monitor for the concentration of airborne asbestos when employees were disturbing and removing asbestos containing ceiling material, linoleum flooring, and mastic from building 9. This condition exposed employees to the potential inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    e)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not monitor for the concentration of airborne asbestos when employees were disturbing and removing asbestos containing ceiling material, linoleum flooring, and mastic from building daycare. This condition exposed employees to the potential inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.

Issued

Sep 6, 2012

Abate by

Sep 11, 2012

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(2)(i):  The employer failed to ensure that the exposure assessment by a "competent person" was conducted in time to comply with requirements which are triggered by the exposure data or the lack of a negative exposure assessment:    a)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not perform an exposure assessment by a "competent person" prior to disturbance and removal of sprayed on popcorn ceiling containing asbestos, linoleum, and mastic in building 5. This Condition exposed employees to inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    b)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not perform an exposure assessment by a "competent person" prior to disturbance and removal of sprayed on popcorn ceiling containing asbestos, linoleum, and mastic in building 6. This Condition exposed employees to inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    c)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not perform an exposure assessment by a "competent person" prior to disturbance and removal of sprayed on popcorn ceiling containing asbestos, linoleum, and mastic in building 8.  This Condition exposed employees to inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    d)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not perform an exposure assessment by a "competent person" prior to disturbance and removal of sprayed on popcorn ceiling containing asbestos, linoleum, and mastic in building 9.  This Condition exposed employees to inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    e)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not perform an exposure assessment by a "competent person" prior to disturbance and removal of sprayed on popcorn ceiling containing asbestos, linoleum, and mastic in the daycare building.  This Condition exposed employees to inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.

Issued

Sep 6, 2012

Abate by

Sep 11, 2012

Penalty

Initial $3,000 · Current $1,800 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(1)(i):  The employer did not use engineering controls and work practices in all operations covered by 29 CFR 1926.1101, regardless of the levels of exposure, in the form of vacuum cleaners equipped with high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters to collect all debris and dust containing asbestos containing material and presumed asbestos containing material:    a)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide HEPA vacuum cleaners or other engineering controls for employees conducting class I asbestos removal of ceiling material in building 5.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    b)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide HEPA vacuum cleaners or other engineering controls for employees conducting class I asbestos removal of ceiling material in building 6.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    c)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide HEPA vacuum cleaners or other engineering controls for employees conducting class I asbestos removal of ceiling material in building 8.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    d)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide HEPA vacuum cleaners or other engineering controls for employees conducting class I asbestos removal of ceiling material in building 9.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    e)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide HEPA vacuum cleaners or other engineering controls for employees conducting class I asbestos removal of ceiling material in the daycare building.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.

Issued

Sep 6, 2012

Abate by

Sep 11, 2012

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(1)(ii):  The employer did not use engineering controls and work practices in all operations covered by 29 CFR 1926.1101, regardless of the levels of exposure, in the form of wet methods or wetting agents to control employee exposures during asbestos handling, mixing, removal, cutting, application and cleanup:    a)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide wet methods or wetting agents or other engineering controls when employees were disturbing or removing asbestos ceiling material in building 5.  This condition exposed employees to inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    b)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide wet methods or wetting agents or other engineering controls when employees were disturbing or removing asbestos ceiling material in building 6.  This condition exposed employees to inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    c)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide wet methods or wetting agents or other engineering controls when employees were disturbing or removing asbestos ceiling material in building 8.  This condition exposed employees to inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    d)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide wet methods or wetting agents or other engineering controls when employees were disturbing or removing asbestos ceiling material in building 9.  This condition exposed employees to inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    e)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide wet methods or wetting agents or other engineering controls when employees were disturbing or removing asbestos ceiling material in the daycare building.  This condition exposed employees to inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.

Issued

Sep 6, 2012

Abate by

Sep 11, 2012

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(1)(iii):  The employer did not use work practices in all operations covered by 29 CFR 1926.1101, regardless of the levels of exposure, in the form of prompt clean-up and disposal of wastes and debris contaminated with asbestos, in leak-tight containers:    a)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not perform clean-up and disposal of waste and debris in containers that were leak-tight, wallboard and ceiling debris was observed at the worksite in dumpsters in piles and littered in the apartment parking lot.  Employees removed building materials from building 5.  This condition exposed employees to airborne asbestos fibers.    b)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not perform clean-up and disposal of waste and debris in containers that were leak-tight, wallboard and ceiling debris was observed at the worksite in dumpsters in piles and littered in the apartment parking lot.  Employees removed building materials from building 6. This condition exposed employees to airborne asbestos fibers.    c)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not perform clean-up and disposal of waste and debris in containers that were leak-tight, wallboard and ceiling debris was observed at the worksite in dumpsters in piles and littered in the apartment parking lot.  Employees removed building materials from building 8. This condition exposed employees to airborne asbestos fibers.    d)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not perform clean-up and disposal of waste and debris in containers that were leak-tight, wallboard and ceiling debris was observed at the worksite in dumpsters in piles and littered in the apartment parking lot.  Employees removed building materials from building 9.  This condition exposed employees to airborne asbestos fibers.    e)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not perform clean-up and disposal of waste and debris in containers that were leak-tight, wallboard and ceiling debris was observed at the worksite in dumpsters in piles and littered in the apartment parking lot.  Employees removed building materials from the day care.  This condition exposed employees to airborne asbestos fibers.

Issued

Sep 6, 2012

Abate by

Sep 11, 2012

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(2):  Control methods were not used to achieve compliance as required by sections 1926.1001(g)(2)(i) through (g)(2)(v):    a)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide any control methods such as:  Local exhaust ventilation with HEPA dust collection system, enclosure or isolation of processes producing asbestos dust, ventilation, or other feasible work practices or engineering controls during removal of friable asbestos containing ceiling material from building 5.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    b)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide any control methods such as:  Local exhaust ventilation with HEPA dust collection system, enclosure or isolation of processes producing asbestos dust, ventilation, or other feasible work practices or engineering controls during removal of friable asbestos containing ceiling material from building 6.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    c)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide any control methods such as:  Local exhaust ventilation with HEPA dust collection system, enclosure or isolation of processes producing asbestos dust, ventilation, or other feasible work practices or engineering controls during removal of friable asbestos containing ceiling material from building 8.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    d)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide any control methods such as:  Local exhaust ventilation with HEPA dust collection system, enclosure or isolation of processes producing asbestos dust, ventilation, or other feasible work practices or engineering controls during removal of friable asbestos containing ceiling material from building 9.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    e)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide any control methods such as:  Local exhaust ventilation with HEPA dust collection system, enclosure or isolation of processes producing asbestos dust, ventilation, or other feasible work practices or engineering controls during removal of friable asbestos containing ceiling material from the daycare building.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.

Issued

Sep 6, 2012

Abate by

Sep 11, 2012

Penalty

Initial $3,000 · Current $1,800 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1101(h)(1)(i):  The employer did not provide respirators and ensure that they were used during all Class I asbestos jobs:    a)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide respirators for employees performing class I asbestos removal of ceiling material in buildling 5, exposing employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    b)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide respirators for employees performing class I asbestos removal of ceiling material in buildling 6,exposing employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    c)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide respirators for employees performing class I asbestos removal of ceiling material in buildling 8, exposing employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    d)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide respirators for employees performing class I asbestos removal of ceiling material in buildling 9, exposing employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    e)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide respirators for employees performing class I asbestos removal of ceiling material in the daycare building, exposing employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.

Issued

Sep 6, 2012

Abate by

Sep 16, 2012

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1101(h)(2)(i):  A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(b) - (d) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:      The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 14, 2012, Luis Lozada issued employees respirators while working on a worksite containing asbestos without establishing a written respiratory protection program and none of the provisions in the standard were developed or implemented.

Issued

Sep 6, 2012

Abate by

Sep 11, 2012

Penalty

Initial $1,800 · Current $1,080 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1101(i)(1):  The employer did not provide and require the use of protective clothing, such as coveralls or similar whole-body clothing, head coverings, gloves, and foot coverings for each employee exposed to airborne concentrations of asbestos that exceed the time weighted average and/or excursion limit in 29 CFR 1926.1101(c) or for which a required negative exposure assessment was not produced:    a)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide appropriate protective clothing for employees performing disturbance and removal of asbestos containing ceiling material in building 5, and a negative exposure assessment was not conducted.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    b)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide appropriate protective clothing for employees performing disturbance and removal of asbestos containing ceiling material in building 6, and a negative exposure assessment was not conducted.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    c)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide appropriate protective clothing for employees performing disturbance and removal of asbestos containing ceiling material in building 8, and a negative exposure assessment was not conducted.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    d)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide appropriate protective clothing for employees performing disturbance and removal of asbestos containing ceiling material in building 9, and a negative exposure assessment was not conducted.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    e)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide appropriate protective clothing for employees performing disturbance and removal of asbestos containing ceiling material in the daycare building and a negative exposure assessment was not conducted.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.

Issued

Sep 6, 2012

Abate by

Sep 7, 2012

Penalty

Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(3)(i):  Before the employer permitted its own employees to perform work subject to this standard in areas containing asbestos-containing material (ACM) and presumed asbestos-containing material (PACM), the employer did not identify the presence, location and quantity of asbestos containing material and/or presumed asbestos containing material therein pursuant to 29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(1):    a)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not identify the presence, location, and quantity of ACM and PACM prior to employees removing ceiling material, linoleum and mastic containing asbestos from building 5.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation airborne asbestos fibers.    b)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not identify the presence, location, and quantity of ACM and PACM prior to employees removing ceiling material, linoleum and mastic containing asbestos from building 6.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation airborne asbestos fibers.    c)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not identify the presence, location, and quantity of ACM and PACM prior to employees removing ceiling material, linoleum and mastic containing asbestos from building 8.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation airborne asbestos fibers.    d)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not identify the presence, location, and quantity of ACM and PACM prior to employees removing ceiling material, linoleum and mastic containing asbestos from building 9.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation airborne asbestos fibers.    e)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not identify the presence, location, and quantity of ACM and PACM prior to employees removing ceiling material, linoleum and mastic containing asbestos from the daycare building.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation airborne asbestos fibers.

Issued

Sep 6, 2012

Abate by

Sep 11, 2012

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(3)(ii)(B):  The employer did not inform employers of employees who worked and were working in adjacent areas of the location and quantity of asbestos containing material and presumed asbestos containing material present in the area:    a)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not inform his employees or other subcontractors working in adjacent areas of the disturbance or removal of asbestos containing material and presumed asbestos containing material in building 5.  This conditon exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    b)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not inform his employees or other subcontractors working in adjacent areas of the disturbance or removal of asbestos containing material and presumed asbestos containing material in building 6.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    c)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not inform his employees or other subcontractors working in adjacent areas of the disturbance or removal of asbestos containing material and presumed asbestos containing material in building 8.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    d)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not inform his employees or other subcontractors working in adjacent areas of the disturbance or removal of asbestos containing material and presumed asbestos containing material in building 9.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    e)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not inform his employees or other subcontractors working in adjacent areas of the disturbance or removal of asbestos containing material and presumed asbestos containing material in the daycare building.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.

Issued

Sep 6, 2012

Abate by

Sep 11, 2012

Penalty

Initial $1,800 · Current $1,080 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(9)(i): The employer did not institute, at no cost to employees, a training program for all employees who were likely to be exposed in excess of the PEL and for all employees who performed Class I through IV asbestos operations:    a)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide employees who were disturbing or removing asbestos ceiling material in building 5, with asbestos training regarding the hazards of asbestos and the proper methods for class I work.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    b)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide employees who were disturbing or removing asbestos ceiling material in building 6, with asbestos training regarding the hazards of asbestos and the proper methods for class I work.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    c)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide employees who were disturbing or removing asbestos ceiling material in building 8, with asbestos training regarding the hazards of asbestos and the proper methods for class I work.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    d)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide employees who were disturbing or removing asbestos ceiling material in building 9, with asbestos training regarding the hazards of asbestos and the proper methods for class I work.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.    e)  The Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments:  On or about March 9, 2012 and at times prior to, Luis Lozada did not provide employees who were disturbing or removing asbestos ceiling material in the daycare building, with asbestos training regarding the hazards of asbestos and the proper methods for class I work.  This condition exposed employees to the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers.