NORTH BALTIMORE, OH —
OSHA Inspection: SMC ALUMINUM FOUNDRY, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SMC ALUMINUM FOUNDRY, LLC in 100 PETERS STREET, NORTH BALTIMORE, OH 45872 (NAICS 331524). OSHA activity number 334485547.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SMC ALUMINUM FOUNDRY, LLC
- Site address
- 100 PETERS STREET
- City
- NORTH BALTIMORE
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45872
- Mailing
- 100 PETERS STREET, NORTH BALTIMORE, OH 45872
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 331524
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 E01
- Issued
- Oct 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $560 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(e)(1): The railing did not have a vertical height of 42 inches nominal from upper surface of top rail to floor, platform, runway, or ramp level and the intermediate rail was not approximately halfway between the top rail and the floor, platform, runway, or ramp: a) On or about May 30, 2012, employees working on the sand handling system on the second floor were not protected from fall hazards due to the existing guardrail height not being adequate.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $560
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.146 C01
- Issued
- Oct 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 23, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $980 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(1): The employer did not evaluate the workplace to determine if any spaces were permit-required confined spaces: a) On or about May 30, 2012, the employer did not assure an evaluation was conducted to determine if any spaces are permit-required confined spaces.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $980
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.146 D03
- Issued
- Oct 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 23, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(3): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not develop and implement the means, procedures, and practices necessary for safe permit space entry operations: a) On or about May 30, 2012, the employer did not assure a permit required confined space program was developed and implemented prior to employees entering the permit required confined space of the sand holding bin.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Oct 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 23, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $980 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: a) On or about May 30, 2012, the employer did not have a lock out program for the control of the hazardous energy, which includes machine specific procedures, training, and periodic inspections, while performing maintenance or servicing on machines such as, but not limited to, the core machine, the band saws and the belt sanders. Failure to lock out machines while maintenance/servicing are being performed exposes employees to hazards such as amputation and caught in hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $980
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Oct 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 23, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $980 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a) On or about May 30, 2012, the employer did not assure that the two vertical band saws used to trim aluminum molds were properly guarded exposing employees to laceration hazards during operation. b) On or about May 30, 2012, the employer did not assure that shaft on the belt sanders were properly guarded exposing employees to caught-in hazards during operation. c) On or about May 30, 2012, the employer did not assure that the core making machine was properly guarded exposing employees to crushing hazards from the dies closing during operation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $980
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections at SMC Aluminum Foundry, LLC
View SMC Aluminum Foundry, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 331524)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334485547.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.