Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: SOUTHERN FAB & SUPPORTS, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of SOUTHERN FAB & SUPPORTS, INC. in 1510 E. DALLAS ST., CONROE, TX 77301 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 334486933.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Southern FAB & Supports, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Southern FAB & Supports, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1510 E. DALLAS ST.
City
CONROE
State
TX
ZIP
77301
Mailing
1510 E. DALLAS ST., CONROE, TX 77301
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2012
Abate by
Jun 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:  The employer does not ensure that employees wear the proper protective equipment while operating forklifts. This violation was observed on or about May 30, 2012, when employees working throughout the facility were exposed to crushed-by hazards while operating a forklift without wearing a seatbelt.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2012
Abate by
Jun 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):  The employer does not guard the point of operation of machines whose operation exposes employees to injury.  a. This violation was observed on or about May 30, 2012, in the fabrication area where employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating an ironworker without point of operation guards.  b. This violation was observed on or about May 30, 2012, in the fabrication area where employees were exposed to caught-in hazards when operating a roll bending machine without a point of operation guard.  c. This violation was observed on or about May 30, 2012, in the fabrication area where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-in hazards when operating a drill press without a point of operation guard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2012
Abate by
Jun 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:  The employer does not ensure that the work rests on all offhand grinding machines are adjusted with a maximum opening of one-eighth inch to prevent employee injury. This violation was observed on or about May 30, 2012, in the fabrication area where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a bench grinder without adjusting the work rest to a maximum opening of one-eighth inch between the rest and the wheel.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.243 C03

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2012
Abate by
Jun 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.243(c)(3): Abrasive wheels used on vertical portable grinder(s) (right angle head grinders) were not provided with safety guard(s) having a maximum exposure angle of 180 degrees and located between the operator and wheel:  The employer does not ensure that all angle grinders are equipped with guards to protect employees from injury.  This violation was observed on or about May 30, 2012, when employees working throughout the facility were exposed to struck-by hazards while using angle grinders without guards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $800
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2012
Abate by
Jun 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment:  The employer has not performed a hazard assessment of the workplace to determine hazards that are present, or likely to be present. This violation occurred on or about May 30, 2012, and at times prior thereto, when employees working throughout the facility were fabricating metal products before an assessment of the workplace had been conducted to determine appropriate personal protective equipment needed to protect against present or likely hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.178 L02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2012
Abate by
Jun 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace:  The employer does not ensure that employees required to operate forklifts are trained and evaluated to ensure they can operate them safely. This violation occurred on or about May 30, 2012, and at times prior thereto, when employees in the facility were required to operate forklifts while moving material without having been trained and evaluated to ensure they could do so safely.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334486933.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.