OSHA Inspection: V. NANFITO ROOFING & SIDING, INC.

Issued

Jul 3, 2012

Abate by

Jul 25, 2012

Penalty

Initial $1,200 · Current $650 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii):     The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a power industrial truck.       Worksite: The employer did not insure that each forklift driver is trained and certified to operate a power industrial truck.

Issued

Jul 3, 2012

Abate by

Jul 25, 2012

Penalty

Initial $1,600 · Current $860 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.95(a):     Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, were not provided:      Worksite: The employees were not provided with foot protection while working / walking through roofing materials that contained nails. The employees were exposed to puncture wounds.

Issued

Jul 3, 2012

Penalty

Initial $2,800 · Current $1,490 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b)  Note:  If using these systems was infeasible or created a greater hazard, the employer should develop and implement a fall protection plan meeting the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.      The employees were exposed to a 9 foot 10 inches fall while working on a roof top without utilizing and type of fall protection.