JEFFERSON, GA ·
OSHA Inspection: CATARINO GONZALEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CATARINO GONZALEZ in 50 NELSON DR, JEFFERSON, GA 30549 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 334504933.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CATARINO GONZALEZ
- Site address
- 50 NELSON DR
- City
- JEFFERSON
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30549
- Mailing
- 3700 BUFORD HWY #42, BUFORD, GA 30519
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.404 F06
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $1,360
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous: (a)(LOCATION)(IDENTIFY SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT AND/OR CONDITIONS)(DESCRIBE HAZARDS WHERE NECESSARY) On or about April 27, 2012: a) Employee were exposed to electrical shock when operating a skill saw attached to an extension cord that did not have the grounding pin attached to the plug.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1360
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502. On or about April 27, 2012: a) Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 9.1 feet while standing on the top plate receiving trusses without the use of fall protection systems.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: On or about April 27, 2012: a) Employer failed to provide a training program for employees exposed to fall hazards associated with residential construction of approximately 9.1 and 10 feet while accepting trusses while standing on the top plate of a under construction residential building, in which employees were not utilizing personal fall protection or fall protection methods.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1600
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334504933.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.