Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: ANDRES GUTIERREZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ANDRES GUTIERREZ in 21011 MORGAN KNOLL LN, KATY, TX 77449 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 334508744.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Andres Gutierrez for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Andres Gutierrez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ANDRES GUTIERREZ
Site address
21011 MORGAN KNOLL LN
City
KATY
State
TX
ZIP
77449
Mailing
814 PARKSTONE DR., HOUSTON, TX 77076
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2012
Abate by
Jun 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii).    The employer does not fully plank each platform on all working levels of scaffold. This violation was observed at the construction site on May 29, 2012 where employees were exposed to a 13 foot fall hazard while working from a scaffold that was not fully planked.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2012
Abate by
Jun 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level.    The employer does not protect employees working on scaffolds from falling more than 10 feet above a lower level. This violation was observed at the construction site on May 29, 2012 where employees without fall protection were exposed to a 13 foot fall hazard while working from a scaffold that did not have proper access.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2012
Abate by
Jun 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.    The employer does not provide scaffolds with a proper ladder access. This violation was observed at the construction site on May 29, 2012 where employees were exposed to a 13 foot fall hazard while working from a scaffold that did not have proper access.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2012
Abate by
Jun 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor  did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502.    The employer does not protect employees from falling when working 6 feet or more above lower levels. This violation was observed at the construction site on May 29, 2012 where employees were exposed to a 10 foot fall hazard when performing residential construction activities without fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

View Andres Gutierrez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334508744.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.