Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: A-ABEST ROOFING, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of A-ABEST ROOFING, LLC in 1003 KINGSLEY ST., COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80909 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 334509957.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch A-Abest Roofing, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for A-Abest Roofing, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1003 KINGSLEY ST.
City
COLORADO SPRINGS
State
CO
ZIP
80909
Mailing
5783 CANYON RESERVE HEIGHTS, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80919
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.416 A03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 14, 2012
Abate by
Jun 19, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(3): Before work began, the employer did not ascertain by inquiry, direct observation, or by instruments, whether any part of an energized electric power circuit, exposed or concealed, was so located that the performance of the work could bring any person, tool, or machine into pysical or electrical contact with the electric power circuit.    a)  On or about May 30, 2012, employees were not protected from electrical hazards.  Employees were working in close proximitely to electrical services on the roof of the house and from the house to the garage.  Employees had also placed a ladder on the gutter which was in close proximity to the conductors going from the house to the garage.  When employees climbed the ladder, the weight pushed the gutter down to where it couldcontact an energized conductor that was not effectively insulated.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1600
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 14, 2012
Abate by
Jun 19, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b):    a)  On or about May 30, 2012, employees were not protected from fall hazards in excess of 6 feet while performing roofing work.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1600
  • · Z (S) $1600

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334509957.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.