COLORADO SPRINGS, CO ·
OSHA Inspection: A-ABEST ROOFING, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of A-ABEST ROOFING, LLC in 1003 KINGSLEY ST., COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80909 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 334509957.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- A-ABEST ROOFING, LLC
- Site address
- 1003 KINGSLEY ST.
- City
- COLORADO SPRINGS
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 80909
- Mailing
- 5783 CANYON RESERVE HEIGHTS, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80919
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.416 A03
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(3): Before work began, the employer did not ascertain by inquiry, direct observation, or by instruments, whether any part of an energized electric power circuit, exposed or concealed, was so located that the performance of the work could bring any person, tool, or machine into pysical or electrical contact with the electric power circuit. a) On or about May 30, 2012, employees were not protected from electrical hazards. Employees were working in close proximitely to electrical services on the roof of the house and from the house to the garage. Employees had also placed a ladder on the gutter which was in close proximity to the conductors going from the house to the garage. When employees climbed the ladder, the weight pushed the gutter down to where it couldcontact an energized conductor that was not effectively insulated.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1600
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b): a) On or about May 30, 2012, employees were not protected from fall hazards in excess of 6 feet while performing roofing work.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1600
- · Z (S) $1600
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334509957.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.