ORLANDO, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: B AND B BOATS, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of B AND B BOATS, INC. in 3568 OLD WINTER GARDEN RD., ORLANDO, FL 32805 (NAICS 336612). OSHA activity number 334519337.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- B AND B BOATS, INC.
- Site address
- 3568 OLD WINTER GARDEN RD.
- City
- ORLANDO
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32805
- Mailing
- 3568 OLD WINTER GARDEN RD., ORLANDO, FL 32805
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336612
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
17 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.106 E02 IV A
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(2)(iv)(a): Flammable liquids shall be kept in covered containers when not actually in use. a) Repair Building - A container of webbing solution,which contained acetone, was sitting open on a work table, on or about May 25, 2012.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2400
1910.106 E06 I
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(6)(i): Adequate precautions were not taken to prevent the ignition of flammable vapors: a) Facility-wide - Smoking was allowed around flammable and combustible liquids, on or about May 29, 2012.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.106 E09 I
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(9)(i): Spills of flammable or combustible liquids were not cleaned up promptly: a) Manufacturing Building - Spills and drippings of flammable resins and gels on the floor and table were not cleaned up, on or about May 25, 2012.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2400
1910.106 E09 III
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(9)(iii): Combustible waste material and residues in a building or unit operating area shall be kept to a minimum, stored in covered metal receptacles and disposed of daily. a) Manufacturing and Repair Buildings - Rags soaked with acetone, styrene and flammable gels and resins were put in uncovered plastic trash bins, on or about May 25, 2012.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2400
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): a) Facility-wide - No hazard assessment was conducted, on or about May 25, 2012.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2400
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes: a) Manufacturing Building - Employees were not wearing gloves while handling rollers and rags soaked with resin that contained styrene and acetone, on or about May 29, 2012.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.157 E03
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check: a) Facility-wide - Fire extinguishers were not checked annually, on or about May 25, 2012.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $800
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) Facility-wide - No program was developed, on or about May 25, 2012.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2400
1910.1200 F05
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein: a) Repair Building - There was a container of webbing solution that was not labeled, on or about May 25, 2012.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets (MSDS) for each hazardous chemical in the workplace: a) Facility-wide - There were no MSDS' available at the facility, on or about May 25, 2012.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) Manufacturing Building - Employees were not trained on the hazards of the chemicals. An employee was observed washing himself with acetone, on or about May 25, 2012.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition: a) Repair and Manufacturing Buildings - There was trash, scraps of wood and other materials strewn about tables and other elevated surfaces, on or about May 25, 2012.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.22 A02
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2): Floor(s) of workroom(s) were not maintained in a clean and, so far as possible, a dry condition: a) Repair and Manufacturing Buildings - There was trash, scraps of wood and other materials strewn about the floor, on or about May 25, 2012.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.37 B02
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit": a) Manufacturing Building - Two doors that had been designated as emergency exits were not marked with signs, on or about May 25, 2012.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 16, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) Facility-wide - No program was developed, on or about May 29,2012.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 16, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Facility-wide - No medical evauations were provided, on or about May 29,2012.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 16, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): a) Facility-wide - No fit tests were provided, on or about May 29,2012.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336612)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334519337.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.