OSHA Inspection: LUIS QUZHPI

Issued

Oct 12, 2012

Abate by

Nov 11, 2012

Penalty

Initial $440 · Current $440

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1):     The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:    a)  For Citation 1, Item 1a, issued on 7/25/2012 with an abatement date of 7/26/2012, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.    b)  For Citation 1, Item 1b, issued on 7/25/2012 with an abatement date of 7/26/2012, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.    c)  For Citation 1, Item 1c, issued on 7/25/2012 with an abatement date of 7/26/2012, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.    d)  For Citation 1, Item 2, issued on 7/25/2012 with an abatement date of 7/26/2012, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.

Issued

Oct 12, 2012

Abate by

Nov 11, 2012

Penalty

Initial $440 · Current $440

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1):     The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.    a)  For Citation 1, Item 3a, issued on 7/25/2012 with an abatement date of 7/26/2012, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.    b)  For Citation 1, Item 3b, issued on 7/25/2012 with an abatement date of 8/8/2012, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.

Issued

Jul 25, 2012

Abate by

Jul 26, 2012

Penalty

Initial $2,200 · Current $2,200

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1):     It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part:    An employee was exposed to eye injuries and the employer did not have a safety and health program that addressed areas such as, but not limited to, eye protection.

Issued

Jul 25, 2012

Abate by

Jul 26, 2012

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2):     The employer did not provdie frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials and equipment by a competent person:    An employee was exposed to eye injuries and the employer did noit ensure frequent and regular inspections of the site were performed by a competent person.

Issued

Jul 25, 2012

Abate by

Jul 26, 2012

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):     Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury:    An employee was exposed to eye injuries while useing a pneumatic nailer and the employer did not ensure the use of proper eye protection.

Issued

Jul 25, 2012

Abate by

Jul 26, 2012

Penalty

Initial $1,760 · Current $1,760

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2):     Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:    An employee was exposed to electrical hazards because the metal receptacle outlet box was lying on the ground unsecured and not used as designed and approved by Underwriters Laboratories.

Issued

Jul 25, 2012

Abate by

Jul 26, 2012

Penalty

Initial $3,080 · Current $3,080

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor was an alternative fall protection plan which meets the requirements of 29 CFR 1926.502(k) developed and implemented:    An employee was exposed to fall hazards while performing roofing activities because of the lack of fall protection.  The employee was exposed to a fall distance of 12.5 feet.

Issued

Jul 25, 2012

Abate by

Aug 8, 2012

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):     The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize those hazards:    An employee was exposed to a fall hazard while performing roofing activities because of the lack of fall protection and the employer did not have a training program for providing fall protection for the employee.