Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LUIS MORENO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LUIS MORENO in 1917 3RD ST, MADISON, IL 62060 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 334526738.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Luis Moreno — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Luis Moreno is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LUIS MORENO
Site address
1917 3RD ST
City
MADISON
State
IL
ZIP
62060
Mailing
26136 SHADY LN, WRIGHT CITY, MO 63390
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 5, 2012
Abate by
Oct 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1):     The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:    a)  For Citation 1, Item 1a, issued on 7/19/2012, with an abatement date of 8/2/2012, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.    b)  For Citation 1, Item 1b, issued on 7/19/2012, with an abatement date of 7/20/2012, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 5, 2012
Abate by
Oct 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1):     The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.    For Citation 1, Item 3b, issued on 7/19/2012, with an abatement date of 8/2/2012, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2012
Abate by
Aug 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1):     It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain programs as may be necessary to comply with this part:    An employee was exposed to eye injuries and the employer did not have a safety and health program that addressed areas such as, but not limited to, eye protection.    Abatement certification is required for this items in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.(c).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2012
Abate by
Jul 20, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2):     The employer did not provide frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment by a competent person:    An employee was exposed to eye injuries and the employer did not ensure frequent and regular inspections of the site  were performed by a competent person.    Abatement certification is required for this items in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.(c).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2012
Abate by
Jul 20, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):     Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury:    An employee was exposed to eye injuries while using a pneumatic nailer and the employer did not ensure the use of proper eye protection.    Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.(c).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2012
Abate by
Jul 20, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor was an alternative fall protection plan which meets the requirements of 29 CFR 1926.502(k) developed and implemented:    Employees were exposed to fall hazards while performing roofing activities because of the lack of fall protection.  The employees were exposed to a fall distance of 11.2 feet.    Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.(d).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2012
Abate by
Aug 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):     The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    Employees were exposed to a fall hazard while performing roofing activities because of the lack of fall protection and the employer did not have a training program for providing fall protection for the employees.    Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2012
Abate by
Jul 20, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):     Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:    Employees were exposed to fall hazards because the extension ladder did not extend three feet above the roof.  The employees were exposed to a fall distance of 11.2 feet.    Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1060 A01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2012
Abate by
Jul 20, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1)(iii):     The employer did not ensure that each employee using ladders and stairways had been trained by a competent person in the proper construction, use, placement, and care in handling of all stairways and ladders:    Employees were exposed to fall hazards because the extension ladder did not extend three feet above the roof and the employer had not ensured that each employee had been trained by a competent person.    Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Luis Moreno's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334526738.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.