MADISON, IL —
OSHA Inspection: LUIS MORENO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LUIS MORENO in 1917 3RD ST, MADISON, IL 62060 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 334526738.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LUIS MORENO
- Site address
- 1917 3RD ST
- City
- MADISON
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62060
- Mailing
- 26136 SHADY LN, WRIGHT CITY, MO 63390
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: a) For Citation 1, Item 1a, issued on 7/19/2012, with an abatement date of 8/2/2012, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation. b) For Citation 1, Item 1b, issued on 7/19/2012, with an abatement date of 7/20/2012, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $400
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. For Citation 1, Item 3b, issued on 7/19/2012, with an abatement date of 8/2/2012, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $400
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain programs as may be necessary to comply with this part: An employee was exposed to eye injuries and the employer did not have a safety and health program that addressed areas such as, but not limited to, eye protection. Abatement certification is required for this items in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.(c).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not provide frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment by a competent person: An employee was exposed to eye injuries and the employer did not ensure frequent and regular inspections of the site were performed by a competent person. Abatement certification is required for this items in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.(c).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury: An employee was exposed to eye injuries while using a pneumatic nailer and the employer did not ensure the use of proper eye protection. Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.(c).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor was an alternative fall protection plan which meets the requirements of 29 CFR 1926.502(k) developed and implemented: Employees were exposed to fall hazards while performing roofing activities because of the lack of fall protection. The employees were exposed to a fall distance of 11.2 feet. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.(d).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Employees were exposed to a fall hazard while performing roofing activities because of the lack of fall protection and the employer did not have a training program for providing fall protection for the employees. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: Employees were exposed to fall hazards because the extension ladder did not extend three feet above the roof. The employees were exposed to a fall distance of 11.2 feet. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1060 A01 III
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1)(iii): The employer did not ensure that each employee using ladders and stairways had been trained by a competent person in the proper construction, use, placement, and care in handling of all stairways and ladders: Employees were exposed to fall hazards because the extension ladder did not extend three feet above the roof and the employer had not ensured that each employee had been trained by a competent person. Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Luis Moreno
View Luis Moreno's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334526738.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.