Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: OSGOOD CONSTRUCTION LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of OSGOOD CONSTRUCTION LLC in 864 SECOND NH TURNPIKE, NEWPORT, NH 03773 (NAICS 238120). OSHA activity number 334530847.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Osgood Construction LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Osgood Construction LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
864 SECOND NH TURNPIKE
City
NEWPORT
State
NH
ZIP
03773
Mailing
136 CHESTNUT ST, CLAREMONT, NH 03743
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238120
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Abate by
Oct 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:    a. Site- An employee operating a Genie S-40 aerial lift was not protected from fall and ejection hazards where a personal fall restraint system was not worn.    Note:  As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system.  The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.754 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Abate by
Oct 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.754(a): Structual stability was not maintained at all times during the erection process:    a. Site- Employees were not protected from struck-by and crushing hazards where tension brace rods and portal frames were not installed with the progression of building assembly while erecting a systems-engineered metal building.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.758 D

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Abate by
Oct 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.758(d): Construction loads were placed on structural steel frame work prior to such frame work was safely bolted, welded, or otherwise adequately secured:    a. Site- Employees were not protected from struck-by and crushing hazards where construction loads were placed on top of roof framing where tension brace rods were not installed during the erection of a systems-engineered metal building.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1412 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Abate by
Oct 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1412(d)(1): A competent person did not begin a visual inspection prior to each shift the equipment was used and did not complete the inspection before or during that shift:    a. Site- Employees operating and working around a Koehring 7.5 ton crane, model LRT110-TYP I, were exposed to struck-by and crushing hazards where the crane was not inspected prior to and during each shift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1413 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Abate by
Oct 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1413(a)(1): A competent person did not begin a visual inspection prior to each shift the equipment was used and did not complete an inspection before or during that shift.     a. Site- Employees operating and working around a Koehring 7.5 ton crane, model LRT110-TYP I, were exposed to struck-by and crushing hazards where the wire rope was not inspected prior to and during each shift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1412 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Abate by
Oct 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1412(f)(1): The equipment was not inspected at least every 12 months by a qualified person in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section:    a. Site- Employees operating and working around a Koehring 7.5 ton crane, model LRT110-TYP I,  and a Linkbelt  60 ton crane, model HTC8660, were exposed to struck-by and crushing hazards where the cranes did not have an annual inspection conducted by a qualified person.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1413 C01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Abate by
Oct 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1413(c)(1): At least every 12 months, wire ropes in use on equipment must be inspected by a qualified person in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section (shift inspection):    a. Site- Employees operating and working around a Koehring 7.5 ton crane, model LRT110-TYP I,  and a Linkbelt  60 ton crane, model HTC8660, were exposed to struck-by and crushing hazards where the wire rope did not have an annual inspection conducted by a qualified person.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1417 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Abate by
Oct 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1417(c)(1): The procedures applicable to the operation of the equipment, including rated capacities (load charts), recommended operating speeds, special hazard warnings, instructions, and operator's manual, were not readily available in the cab at all times for use by the operator:    a. Site- Employees operating and working around a Koehring 7.5 ton crane, model LRT110-TYP I, were exposed to struck-by and crushing hazards where the load charts for the crane were not available in the cab or at the site.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1427 K02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Abate by
Oct 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1427(k)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that operators of equipment covered by this standard were competent to operate the equipment safely.    a. Site- Employees operating a Koehring 7.5 ton crane, model LRT110-TYP I, were not provided with operator training from the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

View Osgood Construction LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334530847.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.