Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,473Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-28 Last loaded 2026-07-31

OSHA Inspection: FRIEDMAN RECYCLING OF OF EL PASO

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FRIEDMAN RECYCLING OF OF EL PASO in 5835 WREN, EL PASO, TX 79924 (NAICS 562920). OSHA activity number 334545530.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Friedman Recycling of of EL Paso for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Friedman Recycling of of EL Paso is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5835 WREN
City
EL PASO
State
TX
ZIP
79924
Mailing
5835 WREN, EL PASO, TX 79924
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
562920
Employees
84
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 A05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2012
Abate by
Dec 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(5): Every pit and trapdoor floor opening, infrequently used, was not guarded by a floor opening cover of standard strength and construction. While the cover is not in place, the pit or trap opening was not constantly attended by someone or was protected on all exposed sides by removable standard railings.    On or about May 31, 2012, employer did not ensure that the in feed conveyor pit was guarded by a floor opening cover or guard railing when not in use. This condition exposed employees to potential fall and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2012
Abate by
Dec 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    On or about May 31, employer did not ensure that employees wearing respirators were fit tested and medically  evaluated before using the respirator. These conditions exposed employees to potential health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2012
Abate by
Dec 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment:    On or about May 31, 2012 employer did not assess the workplace area, such as but, not limited to the sorting station for plastic materials to deterimine the necessity of personal protective equipment. Employees were exposed to potential health hazards, such as but not limited to dust and toxic chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334545530.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.