Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: DAN-LOC, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DAN-LOC, LLC in 725 N. DRENNAN ST., HOUSTON, TX 77075 (NAICS 332722). OSHA activity number 334559556.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Dan-Loc, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dan-Loc, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DAN-LOC, LLC
Site address
725 N. DRENNAN ST.
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77075
Mailing
725 N. DRENNAN ST., HOUSTON, TX 77075
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332722
Employees
90
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a):     Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:  		    At the worksite and on June 5, 2012, where a powered industrial truck, Datsun-Model CPF02A2OV-Serial #CPF02-003547, was being operated without wearing the supplied seatbelt, hereby exposing the employee to stuck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2100
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.22 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 24, 2012
Abate by
Sep 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(c):     Covers and/or guardrails were not provided to protect personnel from the hazards of open pits, tanks, vats, ditches, etc.        At the worksite and at the temper line, where employees were exposed to a pit containing hot oil that was not protected by guardrails thereby exposing employees to burn hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2100
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.23 C03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 24, 2012
Abate by
Sep 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(3):     Regardless of height, open-sided floors, walkways, platforms, or runways above or adjacent to dangerous equipment, pickling or galvanizing tanks, degreasing units, and similar hazards shall be guarded with a standard railing and toe board.    At the worksite and along the temper line, a platform adjacent to dangerous equipment, had an unguarded side, thereby exposing employees to falls and burns.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2940
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.23 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 24, 2012
Abate by
Sep 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.23(e)(1):     Standard railing(s) did not consist of top rail, intermediate rail and/or posts and/or did not have a vertical height of 42 inches (106.7 cm) nominal from upper surface of top rail to floor, platform runway, or ramp level:      At the worksite and along the temper line, the platform did not contain an intermediate rail along the side opposite the conveyor system thereby exposing employees to falls
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.179 L03 III D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 24, 2012
Abate by
Sep 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(l)(3)(iii)(d):     Pendant control stations were not kept clean, and/or their function labels were not kept legible:      At the worksite where the pendant control labels for the Kranco 2 ton overhead crane were not kept legible, thereby exposing employees to struck by load hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1680
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.179 N04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 24, 2012
Abate by
Sep 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(n)(4)(i):     The upper limit switch of each hoist was not tried out under no load, at the beginning of each operator's shift:    At the worksite and in the packaging assembly area, the upper limti switch on the 2 ton Kranco crane was not tested, thereby esposing employees to struck by load hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1680
  • · Z (S) $2800

1904.32 B03

Other-than-serious 4 instances 90 exposed
Issued
Sep 24, 2012
Abate by
Sep 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $420 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.32(b)(3):     The 300A annual summary was not certified by a company executive to ensure that he or she has examined the OSHA 300 Log and that he or she reasonably believes, based on his or her knowledge of the process by which the information was recorded, that the annual summary is correct and complete.    The OSHA Form 300A for years 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 were not certified by a company executive.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $420
  • · Z (O) $700

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334559556.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.