Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LORCHEM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LORCHEM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. in 1150 DAVIS RD. SUITE J, ELGIN, IL 60123 (NAICS 333319). OSHA activity number 334578192.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lorchem Technologies, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lorchem Technologies, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1150 DAVIS RD. SUITE J
City
ELGIN
State
IL
ZIP
60123
Mailing
1150 DAVIS RD. SUITE J, ELGIN, IL 60123
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333319
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2012
Abate by
Aug 4, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2):  Where wet processes were used, drainage was not maintained, and false floors, platforms, mats, or other dry standing places were not provided when practicable.    Service Tech Area.  The floor of the room where technicians stood to test and repair equipment, including live voltage testing, was wet with standing water that did not drain properly following testing of equipment with wet processes such as power washers.      Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2012
Abate by
Aug 4, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1910.151(c):   Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    Employees were exposed to corrosive chemical splashes to the eyes when filling 55-gallon drums from 270-gallon totes and adding water to lead--acid batteries in lift trucks.  The employer did not have an emergency eyewash available.    Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c).    Abatement note:  For compliance assistance, refer to national consensus standard ANSI Z358.1-2009, "American National Standard for Emergency Eyewash and Shower Equipment."
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.335 A01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2012
Abate by
Aug 4, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i):  Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed:    Technicians who performed live voltage measurements (110v to 460v) on equipment during servicing and repair did not wear appropriate electrical protective equipment, including but not limited to the following, to protect against electrical shock and arc flash/blast injuries:    a)     Rubber insulating gloves with leather protectors.  b)     Arc-Rated clothing such as arc-rated long-sleeve shirt and pants or arc-rated coverall  c)     Hearing protection (canal inserts)  d)     Arc-rated flash suit hood or balaclava    Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c).    Abatement Note:  For compliance assistance, refer to NFPA 70E national consensus standard "Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace, 2012 Edition", www.NFPA.org.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.335 A01 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2012
Abate by
Aug 4, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(iv): Employees exposed to the danger of head injury from electric shock or burns due to contact with exposed energized parts did not wear nonconductive head protection:    Technicians who performed live voltage measurements (110v to 460v) while servicing and repairing equipment did not wear nonconductive head protection, such as hard hats with die-electric properties, to protect against electrical shock, burns and arc flash/blast.    Abatement certification is required in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c).    Abatement Note:  For compliance assistance, refer to NFPA 70E national consensus standard "Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace, 2012 Edition", www.NFPA.org.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.335 A01 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2012
Abate by
Aug 4, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(v): Employees exposed to the danger of injury to the eyes or face from electric arcs or flashes or from flying objects resulting from electrical explosion did not wear protective equipment for the eyes or face:    Technicians who performed live voltage measurements (110v to 460v) while servicing and repairing equipment, did not wear face protection to prevent burns or injury from flying debris in the event of an arc flash or blast.    Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c).    Abatement note:  For compliance assistance, refer to NFPA 70E national consensus standard "Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace, 2012 Edition", www.NFPA.org.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2012
Abate by
Aug 4, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operators performance was not conducted at least once every 3 years.    The employer did not conduct and certify an evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance prior to operating a vehicle in the workplace for the first time and every three years thereafter.    Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2012
Abate by
Aug 4, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which described how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200 (f), (g), and (h) would be met:    The employer did not have a written hazard communication program including a list of all hazardous chemicals and documentation of employee training.     Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334578192.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.