WINDSOR LOCKS, CT —
OSHA Inspection: SHIELDING MEDIA, LLC
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of SHIELDING MEDIA, LLC in 70 SPRING STREET, WINDSOR LOCKS, CT 06096 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 334580131.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SHIELDING MEDIA, LLC
- Site address
- 70 SPRING STREET
- City
- WINDSOR LOCKS
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06096
- Mailing
- PO BOX 270871, WEST HARTFORD, CT 06127
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238320
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.62 D01 I
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(i): The employer did not initially determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level: a) 70 Spring Street Windsor Locks, Connetticut 06096 - On or about May 03, 2012- The employer was scrapping the paint off the house without determing exposure levels of lead to his employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.62 D02 V F
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(F): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with training as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(l)(1)(i) regarding 29 CFR 1926.59, Hazard Communication: a) 70 Spring Street Windsor Locks, Connetticut 06096 - On or about May 03, 2012- The employer was scrapping the paint off the house without providing employee training reguarding the exposure of Lead and use of protective equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 D02 I
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment, as required in 29 CFR 1926.62(d), and documented that the employee(s) performing any of the listed tasks was not exposed above the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL), the employer did not treat affected employee(s) as if they were exposed above the PEL, and not in excess of ten times the PEL, and did not implement employee protective measures prescribed in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v): a) 70 Spring Street Windsor Locks, Connetticut 06096 - On or about May 03, 2012- The employer was scrapping the paint off the house without providing personal protective measures reguarding the exposure of Lead to his employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.62 F02 I
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(f)(2)(i): The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134(b) through (d) (except (d)(1)(iii)), and (f) through (m) for each employee required by 29 CFR 1926.62 to use a respirator: a) 70 Spring Street Windsor Locks, Connetticut 06096 - On or about May 03, 2012- The employer was scrapping the paint off the house, the employer did not have a respiratory protection program available which would require the use of respirators for the removal of the lead containing paint, and a medical evaluation for the use of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.62 I05 I
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $240 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(i)(5)(i): The employer did not provide adequate handwashing facilities for use by employees exposed to lead in accordance with 29 CFR1926.51(f): a) 70 Spring Street Windsor Locks, Connetticut 06096 - On or about May 03, 2012- The employer was scrapping the lead paint off the house without providing a handwashing facility as a measure to reduce exposure to Lead to his employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $240
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.62 J01 I
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(j)(1)(i): The employer did not make available initial medical surveillance, consisting of biological monitoring in the form of blood sampling and analysis for lead and zinc protoporphyrin levels, to employees occupationally exposed on any day to lead at or above the action level: a) 70 Spring Street Windsor Locks, Connetticut 06096 - On or about May 03, 2012- The employer was scrapping the lead paint off the house without providing medical surveillance to determine the blood lead level of his employees .
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections at Shielding Media, LLC
View Shielding Media, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238320)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334580131.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.