Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: UNI-SELECT AUTO PLUS

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of UNI-SELECT AUTO PLUS in 7051 HART STREET SUITE A-8, MENTOR, OH 44060 (NAICS 423120). OSHA activity number 334580743.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Uni-Select Auto Plus — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Uni-Select Auto Plus is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7051 HART STREET SUITE A-8
City
MENTOR
State
OH
ZIP
44060
Mailing
7051 HART STREET SUITE A-8, MENTOR, OH 44060
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423120
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.157 G02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2012
Abate by
Sep 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2):  The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter:    The employer did not train employees on the use of portable fire extinguishers for those employees expected to fight incipient stage fires.    NOTE:  The employer may exercise one of the following options:    1)	Provide portable fire extinguishers as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1), meet the distribution requirements per 29 CFR 1910.157(d) (75 to the nearest extinguisher for Class A fires and 50 to the nearest extinguisher for Class B fires), and provide training and education for all employees in the use of such equipment and the hazards associated with incipient stage fire fighting as required in 29 CFR 1910.157(g).  The other sections of 29 CFR 1910.157 also apply.    2)	Provide extinguishers as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(c) (1), designate certain employees to be the only employees authorized to use such equipment and require all other employees to immediately evacuate upon the sounding of the fire alarm, establish this in writing in an emergency action plan as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.38(c) and train/educate designated employees per 1910.157(g).  Utilizing this option exempts the employer from distribution requirements of 29 CFR 1910.157(d).    3)	  Establish a written fire safety policy which requires the immediate and total evacuation of employees from the workplace upon the sounding of a fire alarm signal.  This policy includes an emergency action plan and a fire prevention plan as specified in 29 CFR 1910.38(a) and (b).  Utilizing this option exempts the employer from the requirements of 1910.157 to include the need for providing portable fire equipment unless a specific standard requires that a portable fire extinguisher be provided (such as those requirements in 29 CFR 1910.106/107 relating to use/storage of flammable/combustible liquids).  If extinguishers are provided but not intended for employee use, 29 CFR 1910.157(a) and (f) are still applicable (inspection, maintenance and testing of equipment).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $3000

1910.37 A03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3):     Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed:        On 6/5/2012 the rear exit door from the parts warehouse was blocked by material.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2012
Abate by
Sep 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1):     The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):    At the time of inspection the employer had not assessed the workplace for the hazards associated with the handling of acid based automotive batteries. Personal protective equipment including safety goggles and gloves were not provided for this task.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.133 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2012
Abate by
Sep 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1):     Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment:        Employees were exposed to eye injuries from battery acid during the material handling of automotive batteries. Safety goggles were not provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.138 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2012
Abate by
Sep 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.138(a):     The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes:          Employees were exposed to hand injuries from battery acid during the material handling of automotive batteries. Adequate safety gloves were not provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2012
Abate by
Sep 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    At the time of inspection the employer did not have in place a written Hazard Communication Program for employees who are exposed to chemicals including but not limited to engine coolants, propane, lubricants, and automotive oils.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2012
Abate by
Sep 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h):     Employees were not provided effective information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced:    At the time of inspection the employer did not train employees on the hazardous chemicals in their workplace. This is including but not limited to engine coolants, propane, automotive oils, and lubricants.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334580743.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.