Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-03

OSHA Inspection: FRENTZEL PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of FRENTZEL PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED in 125 WEST MELVINA STREET, MILWAUKEE, WI 53212 (NAICS 332721). OSHA activity number 334594165.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Frentzel Products, Incorporated for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Frentzel Products, Incorporated is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
125 WEST MELVINA STREET
City
MILWAUKEE
State
WI
ZIP
53212
Mailing
125 WEST MELVINA STREET, MILWAUKEE, WI 53212
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332721
Employees
19
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Abate by
Nov 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1):     The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    (a)  Employees were exposed to cuaght-in/crushing hazard while performing service and maintenance of machine, such as but not limited to CNC machines, and the employer did not establish and energy control program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Abate by
Dec 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i):     Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    (a)  Employees were exposed to caught-in and crushing hazards while servicing and performing maintenance work of equipment and th employer did not procedures for the control of potentially hazardous energy.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Abate by
Dec 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i):     The employer shall provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees.     (a)  Employees were exposed to caught-in and crushing hazards while servicing and performing maintenance work of equipment and the employer did not provide training on the purpose and function of the energy control program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Abate by
Dec 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):     The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    (a)  Employees were exposed to crushing hazards while operating powered industrial trucks (forklifts) and the employer did not ensure the operators were competent to operate powered industrial trucks by successfully completing training which included formal instrucions, practical training, and an evaluation of the operator's performance.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 19 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Abate by
Nov 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii):     Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    (a)  Employees were exposed to amputation hazards while operating CNC machines and the employer had disengaged interlocks to speed up production and setup times.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Abate by
Dec 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    (a)  Employees were exposed to health hazards while working with products such as but not limited to cleaners, solvents, oils, and lubes and the employer did not develop a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $840
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Abate by
Nov 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):     Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    (a) Employees were exposed to health hazards while working with products such as but not limited to cleaners, solvents, oils, and lubes and the employer did not provide information and training on the hazardous chemicals in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $840
  • · Z (S) $1200

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334594165.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.