Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-03

OSHA Inspection: EXPERT INSURANCE RESTORATION, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of EXPERT INSURANCE RESTORATION, INC. in 12970 HUFFMAN RD., PARMA, OH 44130 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 334599941.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Expert Insurance Restoration, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Expert Insurance Restoration, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
12970 HUFFMAN RD.
City
PARMA
State
OH
ZIP
44130
Mailing
7427 DYKE DR., NORTH RIDGEVILLE, OH 44039
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
14
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.28 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,520 · Current $1,638 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.28(a):     Appropriate personal protective equipment was not worn by employee(s) in all operations where there was exposure to hazardous conditions:    On or before May 23, 2012, during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure that employees exposed to fall hazards wore the proper equipment to protect them. Employees were using make shift devices to protect them; most of the equipment was not rated or designed for this use.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1638
  • · Z (S) $2520

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,520 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11):     Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    On or before May 23, 2012, during roofing activities, the employer allowed employees to work on a roof that was approximately 20 feet high with a 12/12 pitch and did not ensure that the employees were protected from falls.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2520

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,520 · Current $1,638 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a):     Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:        On or about May 23, 2012, during construction activities, the employer allowed employees to work under other employees working on the roof above them and did not protect them from the overhead hazards such as falling tools, material etc.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1638
  • · Z (S) $2520

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,520 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):     Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    On or before May 23, 2012, during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure that employees using air nailers were protected from eye and face injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2520

1926.300 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,520 · Current $1,638 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.300(a):     Hand tool(s), power tool(s) or similar equipment were not maintained in a safe condition:      On or before May 23, 2012, during roofing activities, the employer allowed employees to use a gas powered air compressor with the guard missing with exposed belts and pulleys.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1638
  • · Z (S) $2520

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,520 · Current $1,638 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):     Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladders length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.       On or before May 23, 2012, during roofing activities, the employer allowed employees to use an extension ladder that was not extended or secured to prevent employees from falling during access to the roof.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1638
  • · Z (S) $2520

1926.1053 B05

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,520 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5):     Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder is approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder.    On or before May 23, 2012, during roofing activities, the employer allowed employees to use a ladder that was not set up on a 4 to 1 ratio from vertical.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2520

1926.1053 B07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,520 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(7):     Care was not exercised in placing, lashing, or holding a ladder with slip-resistant feet that was used on a slippery surface:      On or before May 23, 2012, during roofing activities, the employer allowed employees to use a ladder that was placed on top of discarded roofing material and exposed the employees to falls.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2520

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334599941.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.