Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: AEROCOM INDUSTRIES

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of AEROCOM INDUSTRIES in 1921 MILLER DRIVE, LONGMONT, CO 80501 (NAICS 336413). OSHA activity number 334607546.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Aerocom Industries for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Aerocom Industries is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
AEROCOM INDUSTRIES
Site address
1921 MILLER DRIVE
City
LONGMONT
State
CO
ZIP
80501
Mailing
1921 MILLER DRIVE, LONGMONT, CO 80501
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336413
Employees
14
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2012
Abate by
Dec 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $816 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    (a)	Aerocom Industries at 1921 Miller Drive, Longmont, CO 80501:  On and before 6/1/12, the employees were not provided suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes within the Nital etching area where chemicals are used, such as but not limited to, corrosives containing sodium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, and simple green.  This condition exposed employees to a corrosive liquid hazard.    (b)	Aerocom Industries at 1921 Miller Drive, Longmont, CO 80501:  On and before 6/1/12, the employees were not provided suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes within the assembly area where chemicals are used, such as but not limited to, corrosives containing 2-butoxyethanol in Branson MC-2 solutions and simple green solutions.  This condition exposed employees to a corrosive liquid hazard.    Abatement Note:  A feasible means of abatement includes but is not limited to: 1) a portable eye wash device, appropriate for the expected hazardous exposure, and containing not less than one gallon of potable water; or 2) a plumbed emergency eyewash unit capable of delivering not less than 1.5 liters (0.4 gallons) of clean water per minute, with flow valves that are simple to operate, go "on" in one second or less, and remain "on" during the eyewash procedure.  For details on emergency eyewash and shower equipment, OSHA references the American National Standard for Emergency Eyewash and Shower Equipment, ANSI Z358.1.    Abatement Note:  Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $816
  • · Z (S) $1360

1910.215 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2012
Abate by
Dec 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $816 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(2): Abrasive wheel(s) used on grinding machinery were not provided with safety guard(s) which covered the spindle end, nut, flange projections:      (a)	Aerocom Industries at 1921 Miller Drive, Longmont, CO 80501:  On and before 6/1/12, the employer did not ensure that the bench grinder located in the shop had a safety guard which covered the spindle end and nut projection of the abrasive wheel. This condition exposed the employees to the hazards of rotating parts.    Abatement Note:  Abatement certification is NOT required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $816
  • · Z (S) $1360

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2012
Abate by
Dec 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9):  Guard for abrasive wheel machine where the operator stands in front of the machine was not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel:    (a)	Aerocom Industries at 1921 Miller Drive, Longmont, CO 80501:  On and before 6/1/12, the employer did not ensure that the bench grinder located in the maintenance room had the correct distance between the wheel periphery and the end of the peripheral member at the top and did not exceed 1/4" because the adjustable tongue was missing.  This condition exposed the employees to the hazard of flying chips and debris.    Abatement Note:  Abatement certification is NOT required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2012
Abate by
Dec 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $816 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazards created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:      a)     Aerocom Industries at 1921 Miller Drive, Longmont, CO 80501:  On and before 6/1/12, the employer did not protect employees from hazards created by a rotating fan blade in the compressor room. The guard on the fan was missing. This condition exposed employees to amputation hazards.      Abatement Note:  Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $816
  • · Z (S) $1360

1910.134 D01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2012
Abate by
Dec 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:         (a)	Aerocom Industries at 1921 Miller Drive, Longmont, CO 80501:  On and before 6/1/12, the employer did not evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace.  At least 3 employees have performed chemical handling while using a cartridge respirator.  This condition could result in employees not wearing appropriate respiratory protection for the tasks conducted.    Abatement Note:  Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2012
Abate by
Dec 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:         (a)	Aerocom Industries at 1921 Miller Drive, Longmont, CO 80501:  On and before 6/1/12, the employer did not ensure that employees who are wearing respirators had received medical evaluations.  Three employees who were wearing a respirator had not received a medical evaluation.  The employer provided respirators to be worn upon performing chemical handling in the Nital etching area and the DE filtration system.    Abatement Note:  Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2012
Abate by
Dec 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer shall ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l).    a)     Aerocom Industries at 1921 Miller Drive, Longmont, CO 80501:  On and before 6/1/12, the employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training nd evaluation specified per 29 CFR 1910.178(l). The operators of the Yale model powered industrial truck had not successfully completed training and evaluation prior to operation of the powered industrial truck. This condition exposed employees to a material handling hazard.      Abatement Note:  Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F05 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2012
Abate by
Dec 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein:    a)     Aerocom Industries at 1921 Miller Drive, Longmont, CO 80501:  On and before 6/1/12, the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemicals contained within.  Nital etching containers of Sodium Hydroxide, Hydrochloric acid, Alcohol, Branson MC-2 solutions, Simple Green all-purpose cleaning solution were transferred into smaller containers.  This condition exposed employees to a chemical hazard.     Abatement Note:  Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").    Abatement Note: Each container must also have a label, tag, or marking with appropriate hazard warnings which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemical.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334607546.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.