LYNDHURST, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: VMV CARPENTRY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of VMV CARPENTRY in 160 FERN AVENUE, LYNDHURST, NJ 07071 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 334614336.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VMV CARPENTRY
- Site address
- 160 FERN AVENUE
- City
- LYNDHURST
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07071
- Mailing
- 142 CHESTNUT STREET, RED BANK, NJ 07701
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. A) 160 Fern Avenue, Lyndhurst - NJ: An employee was exposed to eye/face injuries while using a Hytachi nail gun. The employee was not protected by eye/face protection, on or about June 6th 2012.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b) Note: If using these systems was infeasible or created a greater hazard, the employer should develop and implement a fall protection plan meeting the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. A) 160 Fern Avenue, Lyndhurst - NJ: An employee was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 11 feet while engaged in roofing work on a residential structure and were not protected by any type of fall arrest system, on or about June 6th 2012.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334614336.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.