Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER VANCOUVER DIVISION

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER VANCOUVER DIVISION in 1601 E. FOURTH PLAIN BLVD., VANCOUVER, WA 98661 (NAICS 622110). OSHA activity number 334616554.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Veterans Affairs Medical Center Vancouver Division for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Veterans Affairs Medical Center Vancouver Division is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1601 E. FOURTH PLAIN BLVD.
City
VANCOUVER
State
WA
ZIP
98661
Mailing
1601 E. FOURTH PLAIN BLVD., VANCOUVER, WA 98661
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
622110
Employees
300
Ownership type
Federal government (D)

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Abate by
Nov 15, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.23(e)(1):     The railing did not have a vertical height of 42 inches nominal from upper surface of top rail to floor, platform, runway, or ramp level and the intermediate rail was not approximately halfway between the top rail and the floor, platform, runway, or ramp:    A)     In the laundry section of the Vancouver VA Hospital, a work platform used to access equipment had a chain guardrail that was lower than 36 inches, and did not have a midraill.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.107 B09

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Abate by
Nov 15, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(9):     A clear space of not less than 3 feet on all sides was not kept free from storage or combustible construction:    A)    In the maintenance shop, at the Vancouver VA hospital, there was a spray booth that had materials stored inside the spraying area.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.107 G02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Abate by
Nov 15, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(2):     All spraying areas were not kept as free from the accumulation of deposits of combustible residues as practical, with cleaning conducted daily if necessary:    A)     In the maintenance seciton spray booth at the Vancouver VA hospital, sections of the booth had overspray accumulations.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.133 A01

Serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Abate by
Nov 15, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1):     The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:    A)     In the Laundry chemical room at the Vancouver VA hospital, employees did not have chemical splash goggles for use when changing the chemical feed on drums containing sodium hydroxide solutions.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Abate by
Nov 15, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.151(c):     Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    A)     In the sterilization building at the Vancouver VA hospital, the employer did not provide an adequate emergency eye wash station for employees working with bleach solutions.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A):     Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and Control:    A)     In the boiler plant at the Vancouver VA hospital, employees were not trained on new procedures and did not know where the written procedures were.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.179 B05

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Abate by
Nov 15, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(b)(5):     The rated load of crane(s) was not plainly marked on each side of the crane:    A)     In the Grounds, and maintenance shops at the Vancouver VA hospital hoists were used on beams that did not have the load rating marked on them.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.213 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.213(h)(1):     The sides of the lower exposed portion of the blade of radial saw(s) were not guarded to the full diameter of the blade by a device that automatically adjusted itself to the thickness of the stock and remained in contact with the m    A)     In the woodworking shop at the Vancouver VA hospital, one of the guards for the radial arm saw blade was stuck in the up position and did not protect employees from the blade.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.215 D03

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Abate by
Nov 15, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(d)(3):     The contact surface(s) of wheel(s), blotter(s) or flange(s) on grinding machine(s) were not flat and free or foreign matter:    A)     In the Carpenter shop and the grounds shop at the Vancouver VA hospital, there were bench grinders that had contamination on the wheels
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 D01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Abate by
Nov 15, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(i):     The employer did not select and provide appropriate respiratory protection based on the respiratory hazard(s) to which the worker(s) was exposed and workplace and user factors that affect respirator performance and reliability    A)     Spray finishing operations in the paint booth at the Vancouver VA hospital were not included in the respirator analysis for the facility.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.303 B02

Other-than-serious 3 instances 12 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2):     Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:    A)     In the grounds shop, the volunteer services office, and the Rehab center computer lab at the Vancouver VA hospital, relocatable power taps were plugged into other relocatable power taps.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.303 G01 I A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Abate by
Nov 15, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(i)(A):     For electric equipment operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, and likely to require examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance while energized, the depth of the working space in the direction of access to live parts (as measured from the live parts where they were exposed or from the enclosure front or opening whwere they were enclosed) was less than indicated in Table S-1 of Subpart S of Part 1910:    A)     In the home based health office, at the Vancouver VA hospital, access to an electrical panel was blocked.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

View Veterans Affairs Medical Center Vancouver Division's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334616554.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.