Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: CENTRAL PROCESSING CORP.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CENTRAL PROCESSING CORP. in 25750 CR 561, ASTATULA, FL 34705 (NAICS 327332). OSHA activity number 334643202.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Central Processing Corp. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Central Processing Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
25750 CR 561
City
ASTATULA
State
FL
ZIP
34705
Mailing
25750 CR 561, ASTATULA, FL 34705
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327332
Employees
65
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 A09

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2012
Abate by
Jul 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,295 · Current $1,377 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(9): Every floor hole into which persons cannot accidentally walk (on account of fixed machinery, equipment, or walls) were not protected by a cover that leaves no openings more than one inch wide.     a) At the concrete plant, building G, three turnable stations in the machine Hawkeye # 1, Model 6X8 H.O.Pipe Plus, S/N PP-161, had a space between the floor and the station of a 10.5 inches, on or abour June  13, 2012.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1377
  • · Z (S) $2295

1910.147 C04 II D

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2012
Abate by
Jul 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,295 · Current $1,377 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(D): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control    (a) At the concrete plant, building G, the machine such as but not limited to Hawkeye machine #1, Model 6X8 H.O. Pipe Plus S/N PP-161, and the procedures to lock out/tag out the machine missed:  " the techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy by machines types and   " the steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy;   " procedural steps for the placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tag out devices and the responsibility for them; and   " specific requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tag out devices, and other energy control measures.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1377
  • · Z (S) $2295

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2012
Abate by
Jul 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,295 · Current $1,377 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirements of this standard are being followed.    a) At the concrete plant, building G, periodic inspection was not conducted in the machine such as but not limited to a Hawkeye PipePlus, Model 6X8 H.O. Pipe Plus, S/N PP-161, on or about 6/13/2012.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1377
  • · Z (S) $2295

1910.179 J02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2012
Abate by
Jul 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iii): Monthly inspections of hooks, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and the serial number, or other identifier, of the hook inspected, were not performed:    (a)At the concrete plant, building G, the hooks such as but not limited to the crane Dewag S/N 87635 were not inspected monthly on or about 6/13/2012.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.179 J02 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2012
Abate by
Jul 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iv):  Monthly inspections of hoist chains, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and an identifier of the chain which was inspected, were not performed:    (a) At the concrete plant, building B, the hoist chain such as but not limited to crane Dewag S/N 87635 had not monthly certification record, on or about June 13, 2012.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.179 L01

Other-than-serious 16 instances 15 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2012
Abate by
Jul 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $765 · Current $459 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(l)(1): A preventive maintenance program based on the crane manufacturer's recommendations was not established:    (a) At the concrete plant, building G, the company did not establish an overhead crane's preventive maintenance program to overhead crane such as but not limited to Demag S/N 87635 with a capacity load of 11 tons, on or about June 13, 2012.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $459
  • · Z (O) $765

1910.215 B09

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:    (a) At the shop: The 8" Bench Grinder, model JBG-8A, S/N 08041420,  the tongue guard was at 1.75 inches from the abrasive wheel, on or about June 13, 2012.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334643202.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.