SANDY HOOK, CT —
OSHA Inspection: ENVIRONMENTAL ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ENVIRONMENTAL ENERGY SERVICES, INC. in 5 TURNBERRY LANE, SANDY HOOK, CT 06482 (NAICS 213112). OSHA activity number 334664190.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ENVIRONMENTAL ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
- Site address
- 5 TURNBERRY LANE
- City
- SANDY HOOK
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06482
- Mailing
- 5 TURNBERRY LANE, SANDY HOOK, CT 06482
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 213112
- Employees
- 16
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not ensure that a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures was established and implemented to include the provisions of (i)-(ix), as applicable Facility: The employer did not have a written respiratory protection program in place for employees who were required to wear dust masks.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $840
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Facility: The employer did not have employees who were required to wear a respirator go through a medical evaluation prior to wearing the respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f): The employee was required to use a respirator without being fit tested with the same make, model, style and size of respirator that was to be used: Facility: The employer did not ensure that employees were given and passed either a qualitative or quantitative fit test for those employees required to wear a dust mask.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L01 II
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a PIT: Facility: Employees who were required to operate a forklift were not trained to ensure they were competent to operate a powered industrial truck safety through successful completion of required training and an evaluation in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.213 D01
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.213(d)(1): Circular handfed crosscut table saw(s) were not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut: Garage: A Makita table saw did not have a saw blade guard in place during operation that completely enclosed the saw blade above the table and the portion of the saw above the material being cut.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Facility: The employer did not create a written Hazard Communication Program with all required elements to inform employees of how the company specific program will meet OSHA requirements and how it is to be implemented at the facility.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $840
- — Z (S) $1200
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 213112)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334664190.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.